From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Halil Pasic" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/3] libvhost-user: handle endianness as mandated by the spec
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:13:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200729101304-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfj39ajo.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 06:44 PM +0200, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:40:10 -0400
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:29:28AM +0200, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> >> > Since virtio existed even before it got standardized, the virtio
> >> > standard defines the following types of virtio devices:
> >> >
> >> > + legacy device (pre-virtio 1.0)
> >> > + non-legacy or VIRTIO 1.0 device
> >> > + transitional device (which can act both as legacy and non-legacy)
> >> >
> >> > Virtio 1.0 defines the fields of the virtqueues as little endian,
> >> > while legacy uses guest's native endian [1]. Currently libvhost-user
> >> > does not handle virtio endianness at all, i.e. it works only if the
> >> > native endianness matches with whatever is actually needed. That means
> >> > things break spectacularly on big-endian targets. Let us handle virtio
> >> > endianness for non-legacy as required by the virtio specification
> >> > [1]. We will fence non-legacy virtio devices with the upcoming patch.
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://docs.oasis-open.org/virtio/virtio/v1.1/cs01/virtio-v1.1-cs01.html#x1-210003
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> > Note: As we don't support legacy virtio devices
> >>
> >> Who's "we" in this sentence? vhost user supports legacy generally ...
> >
> > In that sentence "we" is the library "libvhost-user". I would like
> > to avoid s390x being an oddball regarding this. Marc's previous
> > version made an attempt at correct endianness handling for legacy
> > and non-legacy. That spawned a discussion on how we don't want
> > legacy devices in this context. This series makes what seemed to be the
> > consensus reached in that discussion explicit: namely that libvhost-user
> > does not support legacy-virtio.
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Polite ping - what’s your opinion? Thanks in advance.
>
> […snip]
It's a reasonable limitation, but I also don't see anything
that verifies that device is modern only.
E.g. fail setting features if VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 is not there?
> --
> Kind regards / Beste Grüße
> Marc Hartmayer
>
> IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
> Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-17 9:29 [RFC v2 0/3] Enable virtio-fs on s390x Marc Hartmayer
2020-07-17 9:29 ` [RFC v2 1/3] virtio: add vhost-user-fs-ccw device Marc Hartmayer
2020-07-21 13:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-28 10:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-28 11:25 ` Halil Pasic
2020-07-28 11:33 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-17 9:29 ` [RFC v2 2/3] libvhost-user: handle endianness as mandated by the spec Marc Hartmayer
2020-07-21 12:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-30 13:15 ` Marc Hartmayer
2020-07-21 13:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-07-21 16:44 ` Halil Pasic
2020-07-28 10:48 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-07-28 11:31 ` Halil Pasic
2020-07-28 10:52 ` Marc Hartmayer
2020-07-29 14:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-07-29 16:11 ` Marc Hartmayer
2020-07-17 9:29 ` [RFC v2 3/3] libvhost-user: fence legacy virtio devices Marc Hartmayer
2020-07-21 13:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-07-17 10:26 ` [RFC v2 0/3] Enable virtio-fs on s390x no-reply
2020-07-17 10:31 ` no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200729101304-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).