From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D758C433DF for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5756F2074B for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Znm4w4Je" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5756F2074B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:33214 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0j61-0007MX-J5 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:14:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0j5O-0006ug-Pg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:13:22 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.74]:52343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0j5N-0008Jp-9e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:13:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596017600; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=odfJ3bBclk2MMjV8q2jEs3bZ/Ku4061gJdV8lqP3cJE=; b=Znm4w4Jetyc2xMVlmIM9nndqRM0/eoAlJ5/HJ4PZNOsSe//hFcIx5PYLJ8o5eU2QHgNyUl sOWPpxsUtKNlWvmPTh/RVrrMaLB0w1jIfkDtdCswIj1LFmNl6ryI+jjMupBFqzoWiUFR1S y7j3xFldmlvezaN/a9W/2FQT1fTOnfk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-363-CEp5ZunKPNC2hakoX1v1cQ-1; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:13:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CEp5ZunKPNC2hakoX1v1cQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4E658; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (ovpn-113-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.17]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9E610013D7; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:13:05 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv3 6/9] s390x/diag: subcode to query device memory region Message-ID: <20200729121305.19564c4f.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200724143750.59836-1-david@redhat.com> <20200724143750.59836-7-david@redhat.com> <20200727114819.3f816010.cohuck@redhat.com> <963e5931-117e-48cb-b829-d630abff9e42@redhat.com> <20200727120930.7b8803e4.cohuck@redhat.com> <520ac822-df67-b33a-378f-a8f91a3bed2f@redhat.com> <20200727111546.GA13770@osiris> <68205bc1-1ac4-a023-0531-aa1a0c91e17d@redhat.com> <20200728091014.173a7d18.cohuck@redhat.com> <3f337e2d-fc46-b842-cbca-cc4036bf8fe0@redhat.com> <20200729113737.39621d48.cohuck@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.74; envelope-from=cohuck@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/29 03:32:20 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Thomas Huth , Janosch Frank , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Heiko Carstens , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Claudio Imbrenda , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:57:04 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 29.07.20 11:37, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:57:58 +0200 > > David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > >> On 28.07.20 09:10, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > >>> However, I think we really need a central place for definitions that > >>> are not just a Linux/QEMU interface, but can potentially also be used > >>> by other hypervisors/guests. Nothing as complicated as an OASIS spec, > >>> but maybe a git??b project? > >> > >> Sounds good. Maintainers? I can volunteer (+setup/create initial > >> version), but would be good to have other QEMU/KVM maintainers there as > >> well. > > > > Count me in. Best as a collection of rst or markdown documents, I guess? > > > > Yes, alternatively, gitlab/github pages? (which essentially convert > markdown in the repository to html - both is accessible) I guess anything that is (a) easily editable, (b) easily accessible on the web, and (c) easily downloadable is fine with me. > > > gitlab or github? Either would be fine with me. > > Same on my side. >