Re: [PATCH v0 3/4] migration: add background snapshot

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Denis Plotnikov (dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 27.07.2020 19:48, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Denis Plotnikov (dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com) wrote:
> ...
> > > +static void page_fault_thread_stop(void)
> > > +{
> > > +    if (page_fault_fd) {
> > > +        close(page_fault_fd);
> > > +        page_fault_fd = 0;
> > > +    }
> > I think you need to do that after you've done the quit and join,
> > otherwise the fault thread might still be reading this.
> 
> Seems to be so
> > 
> > > +    if (thread_quit_fd) {
> > > +        uint64_t val = 1;
> > > +        int ret;
> > > +
> > > +        ret = write(thread_quit_fd, &val, sizeof(val));
> > > +        assert(ret == sizeof(val));
> > > +
> > > +        qemu_thread_join(&page_fault_thread);
> > > +        close(thread_quit_fd);
> > > +        thread_quit_fd = 0;
> > > +    }
> > > +}
> ...
> > >   /**
> > >    * ram_find_and_save_block: finds a dirty page and sends it to f
> > >    *
> > > @@ -1782,6 +2274,7 @@ static int ram_find_and_save_block(RAMState *rs, bool last_stage)
> > >       pss.block = rs->last_seen_block;
> > >       pss.page = rs->last_page;
> > >       pss.complete_round = false;
> > > +    pss.page_copy = NULL;
> > >       if (!pss.block) {
> > >           pss.block = QLIST_FIRST_RCU(&ram_list.blocks);
> > > @@ -1794,11 +2287,30 @@ static int ram_find_and_save_block(RAMState *rs, bool last_stage)
> > >           if (!found) {
> > >               /* priority queue empty, so just search for something dirty */
> > >               found = find_dirty_block(rs, &pss, &again);
> > > +
> > > +            if (found && migrate_background_snapshot()) {
> > > +                /*
> > > +                 * make a copy of the page and
> > > +                 * pass it to the page search status
> > > +                 */
> > > +                int ret;
> > > +                ret = ram_copy_page(pss.block, pss.page, &pss.page_copy);
> > I'm a bit confused about why we hit this; the way I'd thought about your
> > code was we turn on the write faulting, do one big save and then fixup
> > the faults as the save is happening (doing the copies) as the writes
> > hit; so when does this case hit?
> 
> To make it more clear, let me draw the whole picture:
> 
> When we do background snapshot, the vm is paused untill all vmstate EXCEPT
> ram is saved.
> RAM isn't written at all. That vmstate part is saved in the temporary
> buffer.
> 
> Then all the RAM is marked as read-only and the vm is un-paused. Note that
> at this moment all vm's vCPUs are
> running and can touch any part of memory.
> After that, the migration thread starts writing the ram content. Once a
> memory chunk is written, the write protection is removed for that chunk.
> If a vCPU wants to write to a memory page which is write protected (hasn't
> been written yet), this write is intercepted, the memory page is copied
> and queued for writing, the memory page write access is restored. The
> intention behind of that, is to allow vCPU to work with a memory page as
> soon as possible.

So I think I'm confusing this description with the code I'm seeing
above.  The code above, being in ram_find_and_save_block makes me think
it's calling ram_copy_page for every page at the point just before it
writes it - I'm not seeing how that corresponds to what you're saying
about it being queued when the CPU tries to write it.

> Once all the RAM has been written, the rest of the vmstate is written from
> the buffer. This needs to be so because some of the emulated devices, saved
> in that
> buffered vmstate part, expects the RAM content to be available first on its
> loading.

Right, same type of problem as postcopy.

Dave

> 
> I hope this description will make things more clear.
> If not, please let me know, so I could add more details.
> 
> Denis
> 
> > --
> > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
> > 
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK