Re: [RFC PATCH 06/22] qemu-nbd: Use raw block driver for --offset

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 17.08.2020 um 19:19 hat Nir Soffer geschrieben:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:36 PM Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Instead of implementing qemu-nbd --offset in the NBD code, just put a
> > raw block node with the requested offset on top of the user image and
> > rely on that doing the job.
> >
> > This does not only simplify the nbd_export_new() interface and bring it
> > closer to the set of options that the nbd-server-add QMP command offers,
> > but in fact it also eliminates a potential source for bugs in the NBD
> > code which previously had to add the offset manually in all relevant
> > places.
> >
> 
> Just to make sure I understand this correctly -
> 
> qemu-nbd can work with:
> 
>     $ qemu-nbd 'json:{"driver": "file", "filename": "test.raw"}'
> 
> And:
> 
>     $ qemu-nbd 'json:{"driver": "raw", "file": {"driver": "file",
> "filename": "test.raw"}}'
> 
> I assumed that we always create the raw node?

No, the first form creates only the 'file' node without a 'raw' node on
top. For all practical matters, this should be the same in qemu-img or
qemu-nbd. For actually running VMs, omitting the 'raw' node where it's
not needed can improve performance a little.

What is true is that if you use a filename without specifying the driver
(i.e.  you rely on format probing), you'll get a 'raw' node on top of
the 'file' node.

> oVirt always uses the second form to make it easier to support offset,
> size, and backing.
> https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-imageio/blob/2021164d064227d7c5e03c8da087adc66e3a577e/daemon/ovirt_imageio/_internal/qemu_nbd.py#L104
> 
> This also seems to be the way libvirt builds the nodes using -blockdev.

libvirt actually has a BZ to avoid the 'raw' node for performance when
it's not needed.

> Do we have a way to visualize the internal node graph used by
> qemu-nbd/qemu-img?

No, but as long as you explicitly specify the driver, you get exactly
what you specified.

For exploring what happens, you can pass the same json: filename to QEMU
(maybe with -hda) and then use the monitor to inspect the state.

Kevin