From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
Cc: zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, quintela@redhat.com,
linyilu@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, alex.chen@huawei.com,
ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com, fangying1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 18:30:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200820173009.GM2664@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1597634433-18809-6-git-send-email-zhengchuan@huawei.com>
* Chuan Zheng (zhengchuan@huawei.com) wrote:
> Record hash results for each sampled page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YanYing Zhuang <ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com>
> ---
> migration/dirtyrate.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> migration/dirtyrate.h | 7 +++
> 2 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.c b/migration/dirtyrate.c
> index c4304ef..62b6f69 100644
> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.c
> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include "dirtyrate.h"
>
> CalculatingDirtyRateState CalculatingState = CAL_DIRTY_RATE_INIT;
> +static unsigned long int qcrypto_hash_len = QCRYPTO_HASH_LEN;
Why do we need this static rather than just using the QCRYPTO_HASH_LEN ?
It's never going to change is it?
(and anyway it's just a MD5 len?)
> static struct DirtyRateStat dirty_stat;
>
> static int dirty_rate_set_state(int new_state)
> @@ -71,6 +72,149 @@ static void update_dirtyrate(uint64_t msec)
> dirty_stat.dirty_rate = dirty_rate;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * get hash result for the sampled memory with length of 4K byte in ramblock,
> + * which starts from ramblock base address.
> + */
> +static int get_ramblock_vfn_hash(struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info,
> + unsigned long vfn, uint8_t **md)
> +{
> + struct iovec iov_array;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int nkey = 1;
> + size_t hash_len = qcrypto_hash_len;
> +
> + iov_array.iov_base = info->ramblock_addr +
> + vfn * DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE;
> + iov_array.iov_len = DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + if (qcrypto_hash_bytesv(QCRYPTO_HASH_ALG_MD5,
> + &iov_array, nkey,
> + md, &hash_len, NULL) < 0) {
> + ret = -1;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int save_ramblock_hash(struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info)
> +{
> + unsigned int sample_pages_count;
> + uint8_t *md = NULL;
> + int i;
> + int ret = -1;
> + GRand *rand = g_rand_new();
> +
> + sample_pages_count = info->sample_pages_count;
> +
> + /* ramblock size less than one page, return success to skip this ramblock */
> + if (unlikely(info->ramblock_pages == 0 || sample_pages_count == 0)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + info->hash_result = g_try_malloc0_n(sample_pages_count,
> + sizeof(uint8_t) * qcrypto_hash_len);
> + if (!info->hash_result) {
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + info->sample_page_vfn = g_try_malloc0_n(sample_pages_count,
> + sizeof(unsigned long));
> + if (!info->sample_page_vfn) {
> + g_free(info->hash_result);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sample_pages_count; i++) {
> + md = info->hash_result + i * qcrypto_hash_len;
> + info->sample_page_vfn[i] = g_rand_int_range(rand, 0,
> + info->ramblock_pages - 1);
> + ret = get_ramblock_vfn_hash(info, info->sample_page_vfn[i], &md);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + ret = 0;
> +
> +out:
> + g_rand_free(rand);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void get_ramblock_dirty_info(RAMBlock *block,
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info,
> + struct DirtyRateConfig *config)
> +{
> + uint64_t sample_pages_per_gigabytes = config->sample_pages_per_gigabytes;
> +
> + /* Right shift 30 bits to calc block size in GB */
> + info->sample_pages_count = (qemu_ram_get_used_length(block)
> + * sample_pages_per_gigabytes) >> 30;
> +
> + /* Right shift 12 bits to calc page count in 4KB */
> + info->ramblock_pages = qemu_ram_get_used_length(block) >> 12;
Is this really >> 12 ? Should it actually be
/ DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE ?
(and should you need that or just use TARGET_PAGE_SIZE?)
> + info->ramblock_addr = qemu_ram_get_host_addr(block);
> + strcpy(info->idstr, qemu_ram_get_idstr(block));
> +}
> +
> +static struct RamblockDirtyInfo *
> +alloc_ramblock_dirty_info(int *block_index,
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *block_dinfo)
> +{
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info = NULL;
> + int index = *block_index;
> +
> + if (!block_dinfo) {
> + block_dinfo = g_try_new(struct RamblockDirtyInfo, 1);
> + index = 0;
> + } else {
> + index++;
> + block_dinfo = g_try_realloc(block_dinfo, (index + 1) *
> + sizeof(struct RamblockDirtyInfo));
> + }
> + if (!block_dinfo) {
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + info = &block_dinfo[index];
> + memset(info, 0, sizeof(struct RamblockDirtyInfo));
> +
> + *block_index = index;
> + return block_dinfo;
> +}
> +
> +static int record_ramblock_hash_info(struct RamblockDirtyInfo **block_dinfo,
> + struct DirtyRateConfig config,
> + int *block_index)
> +{
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info = NULL;
> + struct RamblockDirtyInfo *dinfo = NULL;
> + RAMBlock *block = NULL;
> + int index = 0;
> +
> + RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_MIGRATABLE(block) {
> + dinfo = alloc_ramblock_dirty_info(&index, dinfo);
> + if (dinfo == NULL) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> + info = &dinfo[index];
> + get_ramblock_dirty_info(block, info, &config);
> + if (save_ramblock_hash(info) < 0) {
> + *block_dinfo = dinfo;
> + *block_index = index;
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + *block_dinfo = dinfo;
> + *block_index = index;
> +
> + return 0;
You should add some trace_ calls at various places to make this easier
to debug.
Dave
> +}
> +
> static void calculate_dirtyrate(struct DirtyRateConfig config)
> {
> /* todo */
> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.h b/migration/dirtyrate.h
> index af57c80..0812b16 100644
> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.h
> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.h
> @@ -20,10 +20,17 @@
> #define DIRTYRATE_DEFAULT_SAMPLE_PAGES 256
>
> /*
> + * Sample page size 4K as default.
> + */
> +#define DIRTYRATE_SAMPLE_PAGE_SIZE 4096
> +
> +/*
> * Record ramblock idstr
> */
> #define RAMBLOCK_INFO_MAX_LEN 256
>
> +#define QCRYPTO_HASH_LEN 16
> +
> /* Take 1s as default for calculation duration */
> #define DEFAULT_FETCH_DIRTYRATE_TIME_SEC 1
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-20 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 3:20 [PATCH v3 00/10] *** A Method for evaluating dirty page rate *** Chuan Zheng
2020-08-17 3:19 ` no-reply
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] migration/dirtyrate: Add get_dirtyrate_thread() function Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 16:11 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 9:59 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] migration/dirtyrate: Add RamlockDirtyInfo to store sampled page info Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 16:20 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 9:59 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-21 12:08 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] migration/dirtyrate: Add dirtyrate statistics series functions Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 16:28 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 9:59 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] migration/dirtyrate: move RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_MIGRATABLE into ram.h Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 16:31 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] migration/dirtyrate: Record hash results for each sampled page Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:30 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2020-08-20 17:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-20 17:55 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 12:22 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-21 12:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-08-21 12:39 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 13:07 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-22 6:25 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-24 8:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] migration/dirtyrate: Compare page hash results for recorded " Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:36 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 12:01 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-21 12:12 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] migration/dirtyrate: skip sampling ramblock with size below MIN_RAMBLOCK_SIZE Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:39 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] migration/dirtyrate: Implement get_sample_page_period() and block_sample_page_period() Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:52 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] migration/dirtyrate: Implement calculate_dirtyrate() function Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 9:59 ` Zheng Chuan
2020-08-17 3:20 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] migration/dirtyrate: Implement qmp_cal_dirty_rate()/qmp_get_dirty_rate() function Chuan Zheng
2020-08-20 17:17 ` Eric Blake
2020-08-20 18:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-08-21 10:00 ` Zheng Chuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200820173009.GM2664@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.chen@huawei.com \
--cc=ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com \
--cc=fangying1@huawei.com \
--cc=linyilu@huawei.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengchuan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).