From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ppc/spapr_nvdimm: do not enable support with 'nvdimm=off'
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:57:49 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200825215749.213536-4-danielhb413@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200825215749.213536-1-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The NVDIMM support for pSeries was introduced in 5.1, but it
didn't contemplate the 'nvdimm' machine option that other
archs uses. For every other arch, if no '-machine nvdimm(=on)'
is present, it is assumed that the NVDIMM support is disabled.
The user must explictly inform that the machine supports
NVDIMM. For pseries-5.1 the 'nvdimm' option is completely
ignored, and support is always assumed to exist. This
leads to situations where the user is able to set 'nvdimm=off'
but the guest boots up with the NVDIMMs anyway.
Fixing this now, after 5.1 launch, can put the overall NVDIMM
support for pseries in a strange place regarding this 'nvdimm'
machine option. If we force everything to be like other archs,
existing pseries-5.1 guests that didn't use 'nvdimm' to use NVDIMM
devices will break. If we attempt to make the newer pseries
machines (5.2+) behave like everyone else, but keep pseries-5.1
untouched, we'll have consistency problems on machine upgrade
(5.1 will have different default values for NVDIMM support than
5.2).
The common ground here is, if the user sets 'nvdimm=off', we
must comply regardless of being 5.1 or 5.2+. This patch
changes spapr_nvdimm_validate() to verify if the user set
NVDIMM support off in the machine options and, in that
case, error out if we have a NVDIMM device. The default
value for 5.2+ pseries machines will still be 'nvdimm=on'
when there is no 'nvdimm' option declared, just like it is today
with pseries-5.1. In the end we'll have different default
semantics from everyone else in the absence of the 'nvdimm'
machine option, but this boat has sailed.
Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848887
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
---
hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c
index bc2b65420c..95cbc30528 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c
@@ -27,13 +27,17 @@
#include "hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h"
#include "hw/mem/nvdimm.h"
#include "qemu/nvdimm-utils.h"
+#include "qemu/option.h"
#include "hw/ppc/fdt.h"
#include "qemu/range.h"
+#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
void spapr_nvdimm_validate(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm,
uint64_t size, Error **errp)
{
const MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(hotplug_dev);
+ const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
+ const char *nvdimm_opt = qemu_opt_get(qemu_get_machine_opts(), "nvdimm");
g_autofree char *uuidstr = NULL;
QemuUUID uuid;
int ret;
@@ -43,6 +47,20 @@ void spapr_nvdimm_validate(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, NVDIMMDevice *nvdimm,
return;
}
+ /*
+ * NVDIMM support went live in 5.1 without considering that, in
+ * other archs, the user needs to enable NVDIMM support with the
+ * 'nvdimm' machine option and the default behavior is NVDIMM
+ * support disabled. It is too late to roll back to the standard
+ * behavior without breaking 5.1 guests. What we can do is to
+ * ensure that, if the user sets nvdimm=off, we error out
+ * regardless of being 5.1 or newer.
+ */
+ if (!ms->nvdimms_state->is_enabled && nvdimm_opt) {
+ error_setg(errp, "nvdimm device found but 'nvdimm=off' was set");
+ return;
+ }
+
if (object_property_get_int(OBJECT(nvdimm), NVDIMM_LABEL_SIZE_PROP,
&error_abort) == 0) {
error_setg(errp, "PAPR requires NVDIMM devices to have label-size set");
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-25 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 21:57 [PATCH 0/3] spapr NVDIMM: consider 'nvdimm' machine option Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-08-25 21:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] ppc/spapr_nvdimm: use g_autofree in spapr_nvdimm_validate_opts() Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-08-25 21:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] spapr, spapr_nvdimm: fold NVDIMM validation in the same place Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-08-25 21:57 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza [this message]
2020-08-28 13:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] spapr NVDIMM: consider 'nvdimm' machine option David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200825215749.213536-4-danielhb413@gmail.com \
--to=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).