From: Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
To: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.s.norwitz@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
jasowang@redhat.com, QEMU <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>,
fengli@smartx.com, yc-core@yandex-team.ru,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] vhost: check queue state in the vhost_dev_set_log routine
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:36:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901083616.GA18268@dimastep-nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFubqFu8ek_gBVFV1+MaLHnhjkQ=955QYP8Ss84diZrkbuNOAw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:22:14PM -0400, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:37 AM Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:46:03PM -0400, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:41 AM Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If the vhost-user-blk daemon provides only one virtqueue, but device was
> > > > added with several queues, then QEMU will send more VHOST-USER command
> > > > than expected by daemon side. The vhost_virtqueue_start() routine
> > > > handles such case by checking the return value from the
> > > > virtio_queue_get_desc_addr() function call. Add the same check to the
> > > > vhost_dev_set_log() routine.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dima Stepanov <dimastep@yandex-team.ru>
> > > > ---
> > > > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > > > index ffef7ab..a33ffd4 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
> > > > @@ -825,12 +825,24 @@ static int vhost_dev_set_features(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> > > > static int vhost_dev_set_log(struct vhost_dev *dev, bool enable_log)
> > > > {
> > > > int r, i, idx;
> > > > + hwaddr addr;
> > > > +
> > > > r = vhost_dev_set_features(dev, enable_log);
> > > > if (r < 0) {
> > > > goto err_features;
> > > > }
> > > > for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> > > > idx = dev->vhost_ops->vhost_get_vq_index(dev, dev->vq_index + i);
> > > > + addr = virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(dev->vdev, idx);
> > > > + if (!addr) {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * The queue might not be ready for start. If this
> > > > + * is the case there is no reason to continue the process.
> > > > + * The similar logic is used by the vhost_virtqueue_start()
> > > > + * routine.
> > > > + */
> > >
> > > Shouldn’t we goto err_vq here to reset the logging state of any vqs
> > > which have already been set?
> > As i understand it, no we shouldn't reset the state of other queues. In
> > general it is pretty valid case. Let's assume that the backend
> > vhost-user device supports only two queues. But for instance, the QEMU
> > command line is using value 4 to define number of virtqueues of such
> > device. In this case only 2 queues will be initializaed.
>
> I see - makes more sense now.
>
> >
> > I've tried to reflect it in the comment section, that the
> > vhost_virtqueue_start() routine has been alread made the same:
> > "if a queue isn't ready for start, just return 0 without any error"
> > So i made the same here.
> >
>
> In your example is a reason why, if queue 3 is uninitialized, queue 4
> must also be uninitialized? I realize queue 4 being initialized while
> queue 3 is not is a strange case, but it may still make the code more
> robust to use a "continue" here instead of a "break". This also seems
> more like the logic in vhost_virtqueue_start()/vhost_dev_start().
Good point! Should really use "continue" instead of a "break" to keep
the logic. Will update it in v4. Hope to get some review feedback for
the qtest framework update aswell ).
>
> > I've found this issue, while testing migration with the default
> > vhost-user-blk daemon. It fails with assert or sigsegv (don't remember),
> > because it receives NULL for the queues it doesn't have. In general
> > the daemon should not fall, because of unexpected VHOST_USER
> > communication, but also there is no reason for QEMU to send additional
> > packets.
> >
> > >
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > > > r = vhost_virtqueue_set_addr(dev, dev->vqs + i, idx,
> > > > enable_log);
> > > > if (r < 0) {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > > >
> > > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-01 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 8:39 [PATCH v2 0/7] vhost-user-blk: fix the migration issue and enhance qtests Dima Stepanov
2020-08-24 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] vhost: recheck dev state in the vhost_migration_log routine Dima Stepanov
2020-08-28 1:44 ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-08-31 8:24 ` Dima Stepanov
2020-08-24 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] vhost: check queue state in the vhost_dev_set_log routine Dima Stepanov
2020-08-28 1:46 ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-08-31 8:37 ` Dima Stepanov
2020-09-01 3:22 ` Raphael Norwitz
2020-09-01 8:36 ` Dima Stepanov [this message]
2020-08-24 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: prepare the tests for adding new dev class Dima Stepanov
2020-08-24 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk: add support for vhost-user-blk Dima Stepanov
2020-08-24 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: add support for the vhost-user-blk device Dima Stepanov
2020-08-24 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: add migrate_reconnect test Dima Stepanov
2020-08-24 8:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: enable the reconnect tests Dima Stepanov
2020-08-24 13:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] vhost-user-blk: fix the migration issue and enhance qtests no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200901083616.GA18268@dimastep-nix \
--to=dimastep@yandex-team.ru \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=fengli@smartx.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
--cc=raphael.s.norwitz@gmail.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=yc-core@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).