From: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] spapr, spapr_numa: move lookup-arrays handling to spapr_numa.c
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 09:56:43 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200901125645.118026-6-danielhb413@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200901125645.118026-1-danielhb413@gmail.com>
In a similar fashion as the previous patch, let's move the
handling of ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays from spapr.c to
spapr_numa.c. A spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays() helper was
created, and spapr_dt_dynamic_reconfiguration_memory() can now
use it to advertise the lookup-arrays.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
---
hw/ppc/spapr.c | 25 ++----------------------
hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index 172f965fe0..65d2ccd578 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -535,13 +535,10 @@ static int spapr_dt_dynamic_reconfiguration_memory(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
void *fdt)
{
MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
- int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
- int ret, i, offset;
+ int ret, offset;
uint64_t lmb_size = SPAPR_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
uint32_t prop_lmb_size[] = {cpu_to_be32(lmb_size >> 32),
cpu_to_be32(lmb_size & 0xffffffff)};
- uint32_t *int_buf, *cur_index, buf_len;
- int nr_nodes = nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 1;
MemoryDeviceInfoList *dimms = NULL;
/*
@@ -582,25 +579,7 @@ static int spapr_dt_dynamic_reconfiguration_memory(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
return ret;
}
- /* ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays */
- buf_len = (nr_nodes * 4 + 2) * sizeof(uint32_t);
- cur_index = int_buf = g_malloc0(buf_len);
- int_buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(nr_nodes);
- int_buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(4); /* Number of entries per associativity list */
- cur_index += 2;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_nodes; i++) {
- uint32_t associativity[] = {
- cpu_to_be32(0x0),
- cpu_to_be32(0x0),
- cpu_to_be32(0x0),
- cpu_to_be32(i)
- };
- memcpy(cur_index, associativity, sizeof(associativity));
- cur_index += 4;
- }
- ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays", int_buf,
- (cur_index - int_buf) * sizeof(uint32_t));
- g_free(int_buf);
+ ret = spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(spapr, fdt, offset);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
index b8882d209e..9eb4bdbe80 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
@@ -75,6 +75,45 @@ int spapr_numa_fixup_cpu_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
vcpu_assoc, sizeof(vcpu_assoc));
}
+
+int spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
+ int offset)
+{
+ MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
+ SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
+ int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
+ int nr_nodes = nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 1;
+ uint32_t *int_buf, *cur_index, buf_len;
+ int ret, i, j;
+
+ /* ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays */
+ buf_len = (nr_nodes * MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS + 2) * sizeof(uint32_t);
+ cur_index = int_buf = g_malloc0(buf_len);
+ int_buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(nr_nodes);
+ /* Number of entries per associativity list */
+ int_buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS);
+ cur_index += 2;
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_nodes; i++) {
+ /*
+ * For the lookup-array we use the ibm,associativity array,
+ * from numa_assoc_array. without the first element (size).
+ */
+ uint32_t associativity[MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS];
+
+ for (j = 0; j < MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS; j++) {
+ associativity[j] = smc->numa_assoc_array[i][j + 1];
+ }
+
+ memcpy(cur_index, associativity, sizeof(associativity));
+ cur_index += 4;
+ }
+ ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays", int_buf,
+ (cur_index - int_buf) * sizeof(uint32_t));
+ g_free(int_buf);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* Helper that writes ibm,associativity-reference-points and
* max-associativity-domains in the RTAS pointed by @rtas
diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h
index f92fb4f28a..f6127501a6 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ void spapr_numa_write_associativity_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
int offset, int nodeid);
int spapr_numa_fixup_cpu_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
int offset, PowerPCCPU *cpu);
+int spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
+ int offset);
#endif /* HW_SPAPR_NUMA_H */
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-01 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-01 12:56 [PATCH v2 0/7] pseries NUMA distance rework Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ppc: introducing spapr_numa.c NUMA code helper Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ppc/spapr_nvdimm: turn spapr_dt_nvdimm() static Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] spapr: introduce SpaprMachineClass::numa_assoc_array Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-03 1:51 ` David Gibson
2020-09-03 11:28 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] spapr, spapr_numa: handle vcpu ibm,associativity Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza [this message]
2020-09-03 1:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] spapr, spapr_numa: move lookup-arrays handling to spapr_numa.c David Gibson
2020-09-03 11:22 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] spapr_numa: move NVLink2 associativity " Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-03 1:56 ` David Gibson
2020-09-03 14:20 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] spapr_hcall: h_home_node_associativity now reads numa_assoc_array Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-03 1:46 ` David Gibson
2020-09-03 11:17 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-03 1:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] pseries NUMA distance rework David Gibson
2020-09-03 1:49 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200901125645.118026-6-danielhb413@gmail.com \
--to=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).