qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>,
	"Erik Skultety" <eskultet@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
	"Willian Rampazzo" <wrampazz@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] GitLab Gating CI: introduce pipeline-status contrib script
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 18:09:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902220944.GB55646@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <538bde71-5e96-e56d-cbcd-44cf0942590e@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5787 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:13:11PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/9/20 10:55 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:46:56PM -0400, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> >> This script is intended to be used right after a push to a branch.
> >>
> >> By default, it will look for the pipeline associated with the commit
> >> that is the HEAD of the *local* staging branch.  It can be used as a
> >> one time check, or with the `--wait` option to wait until the pipeline
> >> completes.
> >>
> >> If the pipeline is successful, then a merge of the staging branch into
> >> the master branch should be the next step.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 156 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100755 scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status
> >>
> >> diff --git a/scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status b/scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status
> >> new file mode 100755
> >> index 0000000000..4a9de39872
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/scripts/ci/gitlab-pipeline-status
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
> >> +#!/usr/bin/env python3
> >> +#
> >> +# Copyright (c) 2019-2020 Red Hat, Inc.
> >> +#
> >> +# Author:
> >> +#  Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
> >> +#
> >> +# This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
> >> +# later.  See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> >> +
> >> +"""
> >> +Checks the GitLab pipeline status for a given commit commit
> > 
> > s/commit$/(hash|sha|ID|)
> > 
> >> +"""
> >> +
> >> +# pylint: disable=C0103
> >> +
> >> +import argparse
> >> +import http.client
> >> +import json
> >> +import os
> >> +import subprocess
> >> +import time
> >> +import sys
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +def get_local_staging_branch_commit():
> >> +    """
> >> +    Returns the commit sha1 for the *local* branch named "staging"
> >> +    """
> >> +    result = subprocess.run(['git', 'rev-parse', 'staging'],
> > 
> > If one day Peter decides that "staging" is not a cool name anymore and use a
> > different name for the branch :) we should account for that and make it a
> > variable, possibly even parametrize this function with it.
> 
> This script can be used by any fork, not only Peter.
> So having a parameter (default to 'staging') is a requisite IMO.
>

Right, as explained in the reply to Erik, this is just used for
finding the commit ID for the staging branch.  Still, I'm making it
configurable in a new patch, and if people want, we can change the
current behavior to accept any kind of revision (but this would
probably mean changing the options or names, given that -c/--commit is
quite descriptive).

> >> +                            stdin=subprocess.DEVNULL,
> >> +                            stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
> >> +                            stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL,
> >> +                            cwd=os.path.dirname(__file__),
> >> +                            universal_newlines=True).stdout.strip()
> >> +    if result == 'staging':
> >> +        raise ValueError("There's no local staging branch")
> > 
> > "There's no local branch named 'staging'" would IMO be more descriptive, so as
> > not to confuse it with staging in git.
> > 
> >> +    if len(result) != 40:
> >> +        raise ValueError("Branch staging HEAD doesn't look like a sha1")
> >> +    return result
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +def get_pipeline_status(project_id, commit_sha1):
> >> +    """
> >> +    Returns the JSON content of the pipeline status API response
> >> +    """
> >> +    url = '/api/v4/projects/{}/pipelines?sha={}'.format(project_id,
> >> +                                                        commit_sha1)
> >> +    connection = http.client.HTTPSConnection('gitlab.com')
> >> +    connection.request('GET', url=url)
> >> +    response = connection.getresponse()
> >> +    if response.code != http.HTTPStatus.OK:
> >> +        raise ValueError("Failed to receive a successful response")
> >> +    json_response = json.loads(response.read())
> > 
> > a blank line separating the commentary block would slightly help readability
> > 
> >> +    # afaict, there should one one pipeline for the same project + commit
> > 
> > s/one one/be only one/
> 
> 'afaict' is not a word.
>

Yes, good point.  Thomas has addressed this.

> > 
> >> +    # if this assumption is false, we can add further filters to the
> >> +    # url, such as username, and order_by.
> >> +    if not json_response:
> >> +        raise ValueError("No pipeline found")
> >> +    return json_response[0]
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +def wait_on_pipeline_success(timeout, interval,
> >> +                             project_id, commit_sha):
> >> +    """
> >> +    Waits for the pipeline to end up to the timeout given
> > 
> > "Waits for the pipeline to finish within the given timeout"
> > 
> >> +    """
> >> +    start = time.time()
> >> +    while True:
> >> +        if time.time() >= (start + timeout):
> >> +            print("Waiting on the pipeline success timed out")
> > 
> > s/success//
> > (the pipeline doesn't always have to finish with success)
> > 
> >> +            return False
> >> +
> >> +        status = get_pipeline_status(project_id, commit_sha)
> >> +        if status['status'] == 'running':
> >> +            time.sleep(interval)
> >> +            print('running...')
> 
> If we want to automate the use of this script by a daemon, it would
> be better to use the logging class. Then maybe 'running...' is for
> the DEBUG level, Other print() calls can be updated to WARN/INFO
> levels.
>

Makes sense.  I'll look into using proper logging in a future
improvement series.

Thanks,
- Cleber.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-02 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-09  2:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] QEMU Gating CI Cleber Rosa
2020-07-09  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] GitLab Gating CI: introduce pipeline-status contrib script Cleber Rosa
2020-07-09  8:55   ` Erik Skultety
2020-07-09 10:13     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-13  7:20       ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-02 22:09       ` Cleber Rosa [this message]
2020-09-02 22:01     ` Cleber Rosa
2020-07-09 11:50   ` Thomas Huth
2020-07-09  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] GitLab Gating CI: initial set of jobs, documentation and scripts Cleber Rosa
2020-07-09  8:55   ` Erik Skultety
2020-09-03 21:12     ` Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04  9:11       ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-04 14:27         ` Cleber Rosa
2020-07-09 10:07   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-03 23:17     ` Cleber Rosa
2020-07-09 10:30   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-09 11:28     ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-04  0:18       ` Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04  8:23         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-04 14:40           ` Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04  0:11     ` Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04  8:18       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-04 15:10         ` Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04  9:53       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-07-29 10:16   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-04  0:36     ` Cleber Rosa
2020-09-04  9:47   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-20 16:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] QEMU Gating CI Peter Maydell
2020-07-20 17:22   ` Cleber Rosa
2020-07-28 14:48     ` Peter Maydell
2020-07-28 14:51       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-28 16:13         ` Cleber Rosa
2020-07-28 16:15           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-07-28 16:24             ` Cleber Rosa
2020-07-28 15:50       ` Cleber Rosa
2020-07-28 16:08         ` Peter Maydell
2020-07-28 16:33           ` Cleber Rosa
2020-07-28 16:41             ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-07-28 16:54             ` Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200902220944.GB55646@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=bleal@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=eskultet@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    --cc=wrampazz@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).