From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] spapr, spapr_numa: move lookup-arrays handling to spapr_numa.c
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 11:34:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200903013430.GG1897@yekko.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200901125645.118026-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5651 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:56:43AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> In a similar fashion as the previous patch, let's move the
> handling of ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays from spapr.c to
> spapr_numa.c. A spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays() helper was
> created, and spapr_dt_dynamic_reconfiguration_memory() can now
> use it to advertise the lookup-arrays.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 25 ++----------------------
> hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 172f965fe0..65d2ccd578 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -535,13 +535,10 @@ static int spapr_dt_dynamic_reconfiguration_memory(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> void *fdt)
> {
> MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> - int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
> - int ret, i, offset;
> + int ret, offset;
> uint64_t lmb_size = SPAPR_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
> uint32_t prop_lmb_size[] = {cpu_to_be32(lmb_size >> 32),
> cpu_to_be32(lmb_size & 0xffffffff)};
> - uint32_t *int_buf, *cur_index, buf_len;
> - int nr_nodes = nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 1;
> MemoryDeviceInfoList *dimms = NULL;
>
> /*
> @@ -582,25 +579,7 @@ static int spapr_dt_dynamic_reconfiguration_memory(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - /* ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays */
> - buf_len = (nr_nodes * 4 + 2) * sizeof(uint32_t);
> - cur_index = int_buf = g_malloc0(buf_len);
> - int_buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(nr_nodes);
> - int_buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(4); /* Number of entries per associativity list */
> - cur_index += 2;
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_nodes; i++) {
> - uint32_t associativity[] = {
> - cpu_to_be32(0x0),
> - cpu_to_be32(0x0),
> - cpu_to_be32(0x0),
> - cpu_to_be32(i)
> - };
> - memcpy(cur_index, associativity, sizeof(associativity));
> - cur_index += 4;
> - }
> - ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays", int_buf,
> - (cur_index - int_buf) * sizeof(uint32_t));
> - g_free(int_buf);
> + ret = spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(spapr, fdt, offset);
>
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
> index b8882d209e..9eb4bdbe80 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,45 @@ int spapr_numa_fixup_cpu_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
> vcpu_assoc, sizeof(vcpu_assoc));
> }
>
> +
> +int spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
> + int offset)
> +{
> + MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> + SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr);
> + int nb_numa_nodes = machine->numa_state->num_nodes;
> + int nr_nodes = nb_numa_nodes ? nb_numa_nodes : 1;
> + uint32_t *int_buf, *cur_index, buf_len;
> + int ret, i, j;
> +
> + /* ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays */
> + buf_len = (nr_nodes * MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS + 2) * sizeof(uint32_t);
> + cur_index = int_buf = g_malloc0(buf_len);
> + int_buf[0] = cpu_to_be32(nr_nodes);
> + /* Number of entries per associativity list */
> + int_buf[1] = cpu_to_be32(MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS);
> + cur_index += 2;
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_nodes; i++) {
> + /*
> + * For the lookup-array we use the ibm,associativity array,
> + * from numa_assoc_array. without the first element (size).
> + */
> + uint32_t associativity[MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS];
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS; j++) {
> + associativity[j] = smc->numa_assoc_array[i][j + 1];
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(cur_index, associativity, sizeof(associativity));
AFAICT, you could just use a single memcpy() to copy from the
numa_assoc_array() into the property here, rather than using a loop
and temporary array.
> + cur_index += 4;
Shouldn't this be += MAX_DISTANCE_REF_POINTS?
> + }
> + ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays", int_buf,
> + (cur_index - int_buf) * sizeof(uint32_t));
> + g_free(int_buf);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Helper that writes ibm,associativity-reference-points and
> * max-associativity-domains in the RTAS pointed by @rtas
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h
> index f92fb4f28a..f6127501a6 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ void spapr_numa_write_associativity_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
> int offset, int nodeid);
> int spapr_numa_fixup_cpu_dt(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
> int offset, PowerPCCPU *cpu);
> +int spapr_numa_write_assoc_lookup_arrays(SpaprMachineState *spapr, void *fdt,
> + int offset);
>
>
> #endif /* HW_SPAPR_NUMA_H */
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-03 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-01 12:56 [PATCH v2 0/7] pseries NUMA distance rework Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ppc: introducing spapr_numa.c NUMA code helper Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ppc/spapr_nvdimm: turn spapr_dt_nvdimm() static Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] spapr: introduce SpaprMachineClass::numa_assoc_array Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-03 1:51 ` David Gibson
2020-09-03 11:28 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] spapr, spapr_numa: handle vcpu ibm,associativity Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] spapr, spapr_numa: move lookup-arrays handling to spapr_numa.c Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-03 1:34 ` David Gibson [this message]
2020-09-03 11:22 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] spapr_numa: move NVLink2 associativity " Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-03 1:56 ` David Gibson
2020-09-03 14:20 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-01 12:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] spapr_hcall: h_home_node_associativity now reads numa_assoc_array Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-03 1:46 ` David Gibson
2020-09-03 11:17 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2020-09-03 1:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] pseries NUMA distance rework David Gibson
2020-09-03 1:49 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200903013430.GG1897@yekko.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).