From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF8CC43461 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8931206D4 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:38:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C8931206D4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46700 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE976-0002Fr-0b for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 06:38:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE96Y-0001lz-Vx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 06:38:03 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:60465 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kE96W-0005WS-Qj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 06:38:02 -0400 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-407-HW1k0ufHONOHycTfcHB7Ag-1; Fri, 04 Sep 2020 06:37:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: HW1k0ufHONOHycTfcHB7Ag-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB99718A2257; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from linux.fritz.box (ovpn-112-114.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.114]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5E678B34; Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 12:37:54 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: [PATCH] iotests: Remove 030 from the auto group Message-ID: <20200904103754.GC6237@linux.fritz.box> References: <20200904055701.462482-1-thuth@redhat.com> <20200904082513.GA6237@linux.fritz.box> <51e03521-f0b7-bf29-1ab8-9025f2f4ce94@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <51e03521-f0b7-bf29-1ab8-9025f2f4ce94@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.120; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/04 03:58:24 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Am 04.09.2020 um 12:14 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben: > On 04/09/2020 10.25, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 04.09.2020 um 07:57 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben: > >> Test 030 is still occasionally failing in the CI ... so for the > >> time being, let's disable it in the "auto" group. We can add it > >> back once it got more stable. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > > > > I would rather just disable this one test function as 030 is a pretty > > important one that tends to catch bugs. > > Ok, ... should it always get disabled, or shall we try to come up with > some magic checks so that it only gets disabled in the CI pipelines (... > though I don't have a clue how to check for Peter's merge test > environment...)? Maybe we can detect whether we're run as part of the "auto" group and skip the test then (as in QMPTestCase.case_skip)? Kevin