From: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
jusual@redhat.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 21:40:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200904161000.12115-1-ani@anisinha.ca> (raw)
Cold plugged bridges are not hot unpluggable, even when their hotplug
property (acpi-pci-hotplug-with-bridge-support) is turned off. Please see
the function acpi_pcihp_pc_no_hotplug() (thanks Julia). However, with
the current implementaton, windows would try to hot-unplug a pci bridge when
it's hotplug switch is off. This is regardless of whether there are devices
attached to the bridge. This is because we add amls like _EJ0 etc for the
pci slot where the bridge is cold plugged. We have a demo video here:
https://youtu.be/pME2sjyQweo
In this fix, we identify a cold plugged bridge and for cold plugged bridges,
we do not add the appropriate amls and acpi methods that are used by the OS
to identify a hot-pluggable/unpluggable pci device. After this change, Windows
does not show an option to eject the PCI bridge. A demo video is here:
https://youtu.be/kbgej5B9Hgs
While at it, I have also updated a stale comment.
This change is tested with a Windows 2012R2 guest image and Windows 2019 server
guest image running on Ubuntu 18.04 host. This change is based off of upstream
qemu master branch tag v5.1.0.
Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
changelog:
v3: commit log updates providing more accurate information as received from Julia.
v2: cosmetic commit log updates with patch testing information.
v1: initial patch.
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index b7bcbbbb2a..90b863f4ec 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
int slot = PCI_SLOT(i);
bool hotplug_enabled_dev;
bool bridge_in_acpi;
+ bool cold_plugged_bridge;
if (!pdev) {
if (bsel) { /* add hotplug slots for non present devices */
@@ -380,15 +381,14 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
pc = PCI_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(pdev);
dc = DEVICE_GET_CLASS(pdev);
- /* When hotplug for bridges is enabled, bridges are
- * described in ACPI separately (see build_pci_bus_end).
- * In this case they aren't themselves hot-pluggable.
+ /*
+ * Cold plugged bridges aren't themselves hot-pluggable.
* Hotplugged bridges *are* hot-pluggable.
*/
- bridge_in_acpi = pc->is_bridge && pcihp_bridge_en &&
- !DEVICE(pdev)->hotplugged;
+ cold_plugged_bridge = pc->is_bridge && !DEVICE(pdev)->hotplugged;
+ bridge_in_acpi = cold_plugged_bridge && pcihp_bridge_en;
- hotplug_enabled_dev = bsel && dc->hotpluggable && !bridge_in_acpi;
+ hotplug_enabled_dev = bsel && dc->hotpluggable && !cold_plugged_bridge;
if (pc->class_id == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_ISA) {
continue;
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-04 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 16:10 Ani Sinha [this message]
2020-09-07 13:17 ` [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges Ani Sinha
2020-09-09 12:14 ` Ani Sinha
2020-09-09 17:50 ` Julia Suvorova
2020-09-09 18:30 ` Ani Sinha
2020-09-09 18:49 ` Ani Sinha
2020-09-11 15:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-11 16:05 ` Ani Sinha
2020-09-11 16:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-11 16:15 ` Ani Sinha
2020-09-11 16:17 ` Ani Sinha
2020-09-11 18:10 ` Ani Sinha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200904161000.12115-1-ani@anisinha.ca \
--to=ani@anisinha.ca \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).