From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B28CC10DAA for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77E821973 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="NoGWGsVw" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C77E821973 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53696 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFwey-0003lw-Mh for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 05:45:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFweA-0002st-OL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 05:44:10 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:25306 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFwe8-0007Ih-Oo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 05:44:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1599644647; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=B+umb5F9v1Mf3Kcr7eNrizPaOwtFfBybZe6a9CjM/Cc=; b=NoGWGsVwOiNe7BsdBq3SA2/aBToDqu6FeHrp5ij5gsamwM5LbBehhSOxqwSZ0ysLGWtC3/ f55eDymtV+EdKZnGmkLMS9953yL9X6H6ihAC1x3yvC3YMAHdmBz0f2Iie//UDB/liahx6z stceCE8qxEMdrOUka0pSRN/aGu28fvU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-388-i5QtLMleOmWhJKb8fM18bg-1; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 05:44:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: i5QtLMleOmWhJKb8fM18bg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D78A1074647; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (ovpn-113-3.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.3]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020A127BCF; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:43:51 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Christian Borntraeger Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Message-ID: <20200909114351.1f91f330.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200909104623.57664738.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20200624202312.28349-1-walling@linux.ibm.com> <20200715180409.451d217e.cohuck@redhat.com> <20200716140214.3fdc7590.cohuck@redhat.com> <42dde86f-2f12-3b89-0c35-74d69fa3d449@de.ibm.com> <20200909104623.57664738.cohuck@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=cohuck@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=cohuck@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/09 03:20:45 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Collin Walling , frankja@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, svens@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:46:23 +0200 Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:54:40 +0200 > Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 16.07.20 14:02, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:26:20 -0400 > > > Collin Walling wrote: > > > > > >> On 7/15/20 12:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > >>> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:36:35 -0400 > > >>> Collin Walling wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Polite ping. Patches have been sitting on the list for a few weeks now, > > >>>> and it doesn't look like any further changes are requested (hopefully I > > >>>> didn't miss something). > > >>> > > >>> The only thing I had was (I think) the logging of the length you just > > >>> replied to. We can still tweak things like that later, of course. > > >>> > > >>> As these patches depend on a headers sync, I could not yet queue them. > > >>> I can keep a preliminary version on a branch. I assume that the header > > >>> changes will go in during the next kernel merge window? (If I missed > > >>> something, apologies for that.) > > >>> > > >> > > >> Gotcha. Thanks for the update :) > > >> > > >> There was an email on the KVM list a couple of days that made one change > > >> to the Linux header. Just changed the integer used for the DIAG cap, > > >> which should be reflected in QEMU as well. > > >> > > >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg220548.html > > >> > > >> Should I respin this patch series to include the new ack's and account > > >> for the header sync? > > > > > > No need for that, my tooling picks up acks and the headers update needs > > > to be replaced with a sync against a proper Linux version anyway. > > > > > > I've queued the patches on a local branch, and the only patch that did > > > not apply cleanly was the headers patch, which will get replaced later > > > anyway :) Just ping me when the kernel patches hit upstream, then I'll > > > do a header sync against the next -rc and queue the patches on > > > s390-next. > > > > What is the status of this patchset? The kernel part has been merged in 5.9-rc1. > > > > Thanks for letting me know, I'll go and process this now. (Had some > busy weeks + PTO.) There were some minor conflicts, please double check that everything looks sane. Thanks, applied.