From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, david@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com,
mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:24:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200911122424.582340f4.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c495858-c7aa-2e12-ef2b-26952019e8ef@redhat.com>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:45:01 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/09/2020 11.36, Collin Walling wrote:
> > Rework the SCLP boundary check to account for different SCLP commands
> > (eventually) allowing different boundary sizes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
> > Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > hw/s390x/sclp.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> > index 28b973de8f..69a8724dc7 100644
> > --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> > +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,18 @@ static inline bool sclp_command_code_valid(uint32_t code)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool sccb_verify_boundary(uint64_t sccb_addr, uint16_t len)
>
> Maybe it would be good to add a comment in front of the function to say
> that len must be big endian?
What about renaming it to sccb_h_len or so? That would make it more
clear that the parameter is not just some random length.
>
> Thomas
>
> > +{
> > + uint64_t sccb_max_addr = sccb_addr + be16_to_cpu(len) - 1;
> > + uint64_t sccb_boundary = (sccb_addr & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE;
> > +
> > + if (sccb_max_addr < sccb_boundary) {
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void prepare_cpu_entries(MachineState *ms, CPUEntry *entry, int *count)
> > {
> > uint8_t features[SCCB_CPU_FEATURE_LEN] = { 0 };
> > @@ -229,6 +241,11 @@ int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
> > goto out_write;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, work_sccb.h.length)) {
...name inspired by the 'h' in here.
> > + work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
> > + goto out_write;
> > + }
> > +
> > sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
> > out_write:
> > s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb,
> > @@ -274,7 +291,7 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
> > goto out_write;
> > }
> >
> > - if ((sccb + be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length)) > ((sccb & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE)) {
> > + if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, work_sccb.h.length)) {
> > work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
> > goto out_write;
> > }
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-11 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 9:36 [PATCH v5 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] s390/sclp: get machine once during read scp/cpu info Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks Collin Walling
2020-09-10 17:45 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 10:24 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-09-11 14:50 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on provided length Collin Walling
2020-09-10 17:50 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-10 17:56 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-11 18:16 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-12 6:28 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-15 14:27 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-09-11 4:33 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 10:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-09-11 10:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-11 13:41 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 13:54 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 14:52 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-09-10 11:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-11 15:08 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 15:14 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-15 14:57 ` Collin Walling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200911122424.582340f4.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).