From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com,
mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 12:47:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200911124754.1a6c6cba.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200910093655.255774-7-walling@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:36:53 -0400
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> As more features and facilities are added to the Read SCP Info (RSCPI)
> response, more space is required to store them. The space used to store
> these new features intrudes on the space originally used to store CPU
> entries. This means as more features and facilities are added to the
> RSCPI response, less space can be used to store CPU entries.
>
> With the Extended-Length SCCB (ELS) facility, a KVM guest can execute
> the RSCPI command and determine if the SCCB is large enough to store a
> complete reponse. If it is not large enough, then the required length
> will be set in the SCCB header.
>
> The caller of the SCLP command is responsible for creating a
> large-enough SCCB to store a complete response. Proper checking should
> be in place, and the caller should execute the command once-more with
> the large-enough SCCB.
>
> This facility also enables an extended SCCB for the Read CPU Info
> (RCPUI) command.
>
> When this facility is enabled, the boundary violation response cannot
> be a result from the RSCPI, RSCPI Forced, or RCPUI commands.
>
> In order to tolerate kernels that do not yet have full support for this
> feature, a "fixed" offset to the start of the CPU Entries within the
> Read SCP Info struct is set to allow for the original 248 max entries
> when this feature is disabled.
>
> Additionally, this is introduced as a CPU feature to protect the guest
> from migrating to a machine that does not support storing an extended
> SCCB. This could otherwise hinder the VM from being able to read all
> available CPU entries after migration (such as during re-ipl).
>
> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/sclp.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 1 +
> target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h.inc | 1 +
> target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 +
> target/s390x/kvm.c | 8 ++++++
> 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-11 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 9:36 [PATCH v5 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] s390/sclp: get machine once during read scp/cpu info Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks Collin Walling
2020-09-10 17:45 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 10:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-11 14:50 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on provided length Collin Walling
2020-09-10 17:50 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-10 17:56 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-11 18:16 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-12 6:28 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-15 14:27 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-09-11 4:33 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 10:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-09-11 10:47 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-09-11 13:41 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 13:54 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 14:52 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-09-10 11:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-10 9:36 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-11 15:08 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 15:14 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-15 14:57 ` Collin Walling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200911124754.1a6c6cba.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).