From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com,
mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on provided length
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:44:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200915194416.107460-4-walling@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915194416.107460-1-walling@linux.ibm.com>
The header contained within the SCCB passed to the SCLP service call
contains the actual length of the SCCB. Instead of allocating a static
4K size for the work sccb, let's allow for a variable size determined
by the value in the header. The proper checks are already in place to
ensure the SCCB length is sufficent to store a full response and that
the length does not cross any explicitly-set boundaries.
Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
---
hw/s390x/event-facility.c | 2 +-
hw/s390x/sclp.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
include/hw/s390x/sclp.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
index 645b4080c5..ed92ce510d 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static uint16_t handle_sccb_read_events(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB *sccb,
event_buf = &red->ebh;
event_buf->length = 0;
- slen = sizeof(sccb->data);
+ slen = sccb_data_len(sccb);
rc = SCLP_RC_NO_EVENT_BUFFERS_STORED;
diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
index a37cfbf534..4ae6fb400b 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
@@ -231,25 +231,29 @@ int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
{
SCLPDevice *sclp = get_sclp_device();
SCLPDeviceClass *sclp_c = SCLP_GET_CLASS(sclp);
- SCCB work_sccb;
- hwaddr sccb_len = sizeof(SCCB);
+ SCCBHeader header;
+ g_autofree SCCB *work_sccb = NULL;
- s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb, sccb_len);
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, &header, sizeof(SCCBHeader));
+
+ work_sccb = g_malloc0(be16_to_cpu(header.length));
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, work_sccb,
+ be16_to_cpu(header.length));
if (!sclp_command_code_valid(code)) {
- work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
+ work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
goto out_write;
}
- if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length))) {
- work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
+ if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length))) {
+ work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
goto out_write;
}
- sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
+ sclp_c->execute(sclp, work_sccb, code);
out_write:
- s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb,
- be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length));
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, work_sccb,
+ be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length));
sclp_c->service_interrupt(sclp, SCLP_PV_DUMMY_ADDR);
return 0;
}
@@ -258,9 +262,8 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
{
SCLPDevice *sclp = get_sclp_device();
SCLPDeviceClass *sclp_c = SCLP_GET_CLASS(sclp);
- SCCB work_sccb;
-
- hwaddr sccb_len = sizeof(SCCB);
+ SCCBHeader header;
+ g_autofree SCCB *work_sccb = NULL;
/* first some basic checks on program checks */
if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
@@ -274,32 +277,36 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
return -PGM_SPECIFICATION;
}
+ /* the header contains the actual length of the sccb */
+ cpu_physical_memory_read(sccb, &header, sizeof(SCCBHeader));
+
+ /* Valid sccb sizes */
+ if (be16_to_cpu(header.length) < sizeof(SCCBHeader)) {
+ return -PGM_SPECIFICATION;
+ }
+
/*
* we want to work on a private copy of the sccb, to prevent guests
* from playing dirty tricks by modifying the memory content after
* the host has checked the values
*/
- cpu_physical_memory_read(sccb, &work_sccb, sccb_len);
-
- /* Valid sccb sizes */
- if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < sizeof(SCCBHeader)) {
- return -PGM_SPECIFICATION;
- }
+ work_sccb = g_malloc0(be16_to_cpu(header.length));
+ cpu_physical_memory_read(sccb, work_sccb, be16_to_cpu(header.length));
if (!sclp_command_code_valid(code)) {
- work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
+ work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
goto out_write;
}
- if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length))) {
- work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
+ if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length))) {
+ work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
goto out_write;
}
- sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
+ sclp_c->execute(sclp, work_sccb, code);
out_write:
- cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb,
- be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length));
+ cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, work_sccb,
+ be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length));
sclp_c->service_interrupt(sclp, sccb);
diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
index a87ed2a0ab..98c4727984 100644
--- a/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
+++ b/include/hw/s390x/sclp.h
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ typedef struct IoaCfgSccb {
typedef struct SCCB {
SCCBHeader h;
- char data[SCCB_DATA_LEN];
+ char data[];
} QEMU_PACKED SCCB;
#define TYPE_SCLP "sclp"
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 19:44 [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-15 19:44 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] s390/sclp: get machine once during read scp/cpu info Collin Walling
2020-09-15 19:44 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks Collin Walling
2020-09-16 7:10 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 16:12 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-15 19:44 ` Collin Walling [this message]
2020-09-16 8:00 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on provided length Thomas Huth
2020-09-15 19:44 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-09-15 19:44 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-09-15 19:44 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-09-15 19:44 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-09-16 15:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-16 16:11 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-15 19:44 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-16 8:11 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-15 19:57 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 no-reply
2020-09-16 6:37 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-16 15:53 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-16 17:15 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-25 15:13 ` Collin Walling
2020-09-25 15:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-25 15:32 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2020-09-25 15:43 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200915194416.107460-4-walling@linux.ibm.com \
--to=walling@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).