From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Python 3.5 EOL; when can require 3.6?
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:31:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916083102.GD1535709@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875z8eupyp.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:43:10AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> We require Python 3.5. It will reach its "end of life" at the end of
> September 2020[*]. Any reason not to require 3.6 for 5.2? qemu-iotests
> already does for its Python parts.
Note that upstream EOL dates aren't directly relevant. Our policy for
min versions of dependancies is driven by what is present in the various
distro platforms we're aiming to support, and its possible distros will
support it beyond official upstream EOL.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 7:43 Python 3.5 EOL; when can require 3.6? Markus Armbruster
2020-09-16 7:53 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-16 8:02 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:16 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-16 13:53 ` Alex Bennée
2020-09-16 13:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 14:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-16 8:22 ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-16 15:09 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-16 7:54 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 9:50 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 9:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 9:55 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 8:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2020-09-16 12:30 ` Peter Maydell
2020-09-16 13:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-09-16 14:00 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-16 14:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-16 14:57 ` John Snow
2020-09-17 14:10 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 14:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 15:24 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 15:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 15:41 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 15:30 ` Markus Armbruster
2020-09-17 15:39 ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-17 15:42 ` Warner Losh
2020-09-17 16:07 ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-17 16:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 17:02 ` Andrea Bolognani
2020-09-17 16:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-17 16:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-17 16:50 ` Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200916083102.GD1535709@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).