From: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Roman Bolshakov" <r.bolshakov@yadro.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Pavel Dovgalyuk <dovgaluk@ispras.ru>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Colin Xu <colin.xu@intel.com>,
Wenchao Wang <wenchao.wang@intel.com>,
haxm-team@intel.com, Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@microsoft.com>,
Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v8 11/17] cpus: remove checks for non-NULL cpus_accel
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:19:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916142004.27429-12-cfontana@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916142004.27429-1-cfontana@suse.de>
now that all accelerators support the CpusAccel interface,
we can remove most checks for non-NULL cpus_accel,
we just add a sanity check/assert at vcpu creation.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
softmmu/cpus.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/softmmu/cpus.c b/softmmu/cpus.c
index 3d8350fba9..f32ecb4bb9 100644
--- a/softmmu/cpus.c
+++ b/softmmu/cpus.c
@@ -166,34 +166,46 @@ void cpu_synchronize_all_pre_loadvm(void)
void cpu_synchronize_state(CPUState *cpu)
{
- if (cpus_accel && cpus_accel->synchronize_state) {
+ if (cpus_accel->synchronize_state) {
cpus_accel->synchronize_state(cpu);
}
}
void cpu_synchronize_post_reset(CPUState *cpu)
{
- if (cpus_accel && cpus_accel->synchronize_post_reset) {
+ if (cpus_accel->synchronize_post_reset) {
cpus_accel->synchronize_post_reset(cpu);
}
}
void cpu_synchronize_post_init(CPUState *cpu)
{
- if (cpus_accel && cpus_accel->synchronize_post_init) {
+ if (cpus_accel->synchronize_post_init) {
cpus_accel->synchronize_post_init(cpu);
}
}
void cpu_synchronize_pre_loadvm(CPUState *cpu)
{
- if (cpus_accel && cpus_accel->synchronize_pre_loadvm) {
+ if (cpus_accel->synchronize_pre_loadvm) {
cpus_accel->synchronize_pre_loadvm(cpu);
}
}
int64_t cpus_get_virtual_clock(void)
{
+ /*
+ * XXX
+ *
+ * need to check that cpus_accel is not NULL, because qcow2 calls
+ * qemu_get_clock_ns(CLOCK_VIRTUAL) without any accel initialized and
+ * with ticks disabled in some io-tests:
+ * 030 040 041 060 099 120 127 140 156 161 172 181 191 192 195 203 229 249 256 267
+ *
+ * is this expected?
+ *
+ * XXX
+ */
if (cpus_accel && cpus_accel->get_virtual_clock) {
return cpus_accel->get_virtual_clock();
}
@@ -207,7 +219,7 @@ int64_t cpus_get_virtual_clock(void)
*/
int64_t cpus_get_elapsed_ticks(void)
{
- if (cpus_accel && cpus_accel->get_elapsed_ticks) {
+ if (cpus_accel->get_elapsed_ticks) {
return cpus_accel->get_elapsed_ticks();
}
return cpu_get_ticks();
@@ -399,7 +411,7 @@ void cpus_kick_thread(CPUState *cpu)
void qemu_cpu_kick(CPUState *cpu)
{
qemu_cond_broadcast(cpu->halt_cond);
- if (cpus_accel && cpus_accel->kick_vcpu_thread) {
+ if (cpus_accel->kick_vcpu_thread) {
cpus_accel->kick_vcpu_thread(cpu);
} else { /* default */
cpus_kick_thread(cpu);
@@ -573,12 +585,9 @@ void qemu_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu)
cpu_address_space_init(cpu, 0, "cpu-memory", cpu->memory);
}
- if (cpus_accel) {
- /* accelerator already implements the CpusAccel interface */
- cpus_accel->create_vcpu_thread(cpu);
- } else {
- g_assert_not_reached();
- }
+ /* accelerators all implement the CpusAccel interface */
+ g_assert(cpus_accel != NULL && cpus_accel->create_vcpu_thread != NULL);
+ cpus_accel->create_vcpu_thread(cpu);
while (!cpu->created) {
qemu_cond_wait(&qemu_cpu_cond, &qemu_global_mutex);
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 14:19 [PATCH v8 00/17] QEMU cpus.c refactoring part2 Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 01/17] cpu-timers, icount: new modules Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 02/17] icount: rename functions to be consistent with the module name Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 03/17] cpus: prepare new CpusAccel cpu accelerator interface Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 04/17] cpus: extract out TCG-specific code to accel/tcg Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 05/17] cpus: extract out qtest-specific code to accel/qtest Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 06/17] cpus: extract out kvm-specific code to accel/kvm Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 07/17] cpus: extract out hax-specific code to target/i386/ Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 08/17] cpus: extract out whpx-specific " Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 09/17] cpus: extract out hvf-specific code to target/i386/hvf/ Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 10/17] cpus: cleanup now unneeded includes Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:19 ` Claudio Fontana [this message]
2020-09-16 14:19 ` [PATCH v8 12/17] cpus: add handle_interrupt to the CpusAccel interface Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v8 13/17] hvf: remove hvf specific functions from global includes Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v8 14/17] whpx: remove whpx " Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v8 15/17] hax: remove hax " Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v8 16/17] kvm: remove kvm " Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 14:20 ` [PATCH v8 17/17] accel/tcg: use current_machine as it is always set for softmmu Claudio Fontana
2020-09-16 15:24 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-09-18 19:00 ` [PATCH v8 00/17] QEMU cpus.c refactoring part2 Richard Henderson
2020-09-25 13:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-25 16:09 ` Claudio Fontana
2020-09-25 16:55 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200916142004.27429-12-cfontana@suse.de \
--to=cfontana@suse.de \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berto@igalia.com \
--cc=colin.xu@intel.com \
--cc=dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=haxm-team@intel.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=r.bolshakov@yadro.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=sunilmut@microsoft.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wenchao.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).