[PATCH v2 2/3] virtio-blk: undo destructive iov_discard_*() operations

[Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>]

Fuzzing discovered that virtqueue_unmap_sg() is being called on modified
req->in/out_sg iovecs. This means dma_memory_map() and
dma_memory_unmap() calls do not have matching memory addresses.

Fuzzing discovered that non-RAM addresses trigger a bug:

  void address_space_unmap(AddressSpace *as, void *buffer, hwaddr len,
                           bool is_write, hwaddr access_len)
  {
      if (buffer != bounce.buffer) {
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

A modified iov->iov_base is no longer recognized as a bounce buffer and
the wrong branch is taken.

There are more potential bugs: dirty memory is not tracked correctly and
MemoryRegion refcounts can be leaked.

Use the new iov_discard_undo() API to restore elem->in/out_sg before
virtqueue_push() is called.

Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1890360
Fixes: 827805a2492c1bbf1c0712ed18ee069b4ebf3dd6 ("virtio-blk: Convert VirtIOBlockReq.out to structrue")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
 include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h |  2 ++
 hw/block/virtio-blk.c          | 11 +++++++++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
index 29c9f32353..df3876d49c 100644
--- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
+++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ typedef struct VirtIOBlockReq {
     int64_t sector_num;
     VirtIOBlock *dev;
     VirtQueue *vq;
+    IOVDiscardUndo inhdr_undo;
+    IOVDiscardUndo outhdr_undo;
     struct virtio_blk_inhdr *in;
     struct virtio_blk_outhdr out;
     QEMUIOVector qiov;
diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
index 2204ba149e..bac2d6fa2b 100644
--- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
+++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static void virtio_blk_req_complete(VirtIOBlockReq *req, unsigned char status)
     trace_virtio_blk_req_complete(vdev, req, status);
 
     stb_p(&req->in->status, status);
+    iov_discard_undo(&req->inhdr_undo);
+    iov_discard_undo(&req->outhdr_undo);
     virtqueue_push(req->vq, &req->elem, req->in_len);
     if (s->dataplane_started && !s->dataplane_disabled) {
         virtio_blk_data_plane_notify(s->dataplane, req->vq);
@@ -632,10 +634,12 @@ static int virtio_blk_handle_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req, MultiReqBuffer *mrb)
         return -1;
     }
 
-    iov_discard_front(&out_iov, &out_num, sizeof(req->out));
+    iov_discard_front_undoable(&out_iov, &out_num, sizeof(req->out),
+                               &req->outhdr_undo);
 
     if (in_iov[in_num - 1].iov_len < sizeof(struct virtio_blk_inhdr)) {
         virtio_error(vdev, "virtio-blk request inhdr too short");
+        iov_discard_undo(&req->outhdr_undo);
         return -1;
     }
 
@@ -644,7 +648,8 @@ static int virtio_blk_handle_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req, MultiReqBuffer *mrb)
     req->in = (void *)in_iov[in_num - 1].iov_base
               + in_iov[in_num - 1].iov_len
               - sizeof(struct virtio_blk_inhdr);
-    iov_discard_back(in_iov, &in_num, sizeof(struct virtio_blk_inhdr));
+    iov_discard_back_undoable(in_iov, &in_num, sizeof(struct virtio_blk_inhdr),
+                              &req->inhdr_undo);
 
     type = virtio_ldl_p(vdev, &req->out.type);
 
@@ -739,6 +744,8 @@ static int virtio_blk_handle_request(VirtIOBlockReq *req, MultiReqBuffer *mrb)
 
         if (unlikely(iov_to_buf(out_iov, out_num, 0, &dwz_hdr,
                                 sizeof(dwz_hdr)) != sizeof(dwz_hdr))) {
+            iov_discard_undo(&req->inhdr_undo);
+            iov_discard_undo(&req->outhdr_undo);
             virtio_error(vdev, "virtio-blk discard/write_zeroes header"
                          " too short");
             return -1;
-- 
2.26.2