Re: [PATCH] target/i386: always create kvmclock device

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Vitaly Kuznetsov (vkuznets@redhat.com) wrote:
> Antoine Damhet <antoine.damhet@blade-group.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:13:06PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> QEMU's kvmclock device is only created when KVM PV feature bits for
> >> kvmclock (KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE/KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2) are
> >> exposed to the guest. With 'kvm=off' cpu flag the device is not
> >> created and we don't call KVM_GET_CLOCK/KVM_SET_CLOCK upon migration.
> >> It was reported that without these call at least Hyper-V TSC page
> >> clocksouce (which can be enabled independently) gets broken after
> >> migration.
> >> 
> >> Switch to creating kvmclock QEMU device unconditionally, it seems
> >> to always make sense to call KVM_GET_CLOCK/KVM_SET_CLOCK on migration.
> >> Use KVM_CAP_ADJUST_CLOCK check instead of CPUID feature bits.
> >> 
> >> Reported-by: Antoine Damhet <antoine.damhet@blade-group.com>
> >> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  hw/i386/kvm/clock.c    | 6 +-----
> >>  target/i386/kvm.c      | 5 +++++
> >>  target/i386/kvm_i386.h | 1 +
> >>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c b/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
> >> index 64283358f91d..526c9ea5172b 100644
> >> --- a/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
> >> +++ b/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
> >> @@ -330,11 +330,7 @@ static const TypeInfo kvmclock_info = {
> >>  /* Note: Must be called after VCPU initialization. */
> >>  void kvmclock_create(void)
> >>  {
> >> -    X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(first_cpu);
> >> -
> >> -    if (kvm_enabled() &&
> >> -        cpu->env.features[FEAT_KVM] & ((1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE) |
> >> -                                       (1ULL << KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE2))) {
> >> +    if (kvm_enabled() && kvm_has_adjust_clock()) {
> >
> > Shouldn't the old check used when machine type <= 5.1 in order to avoid
> > migration incompatibility ?
> 
> Hm, when the check fails we just don't create the device and no error is
> reported, so even if we have kvmclock data in the migration stream but
> fail to create it migration will still succeed, right? (not a migration
> expert here :-)

When the migration stream is parsed, it'll try and find a "kvmclock"
device to pass the data it's reading to; if one doesn't exist it'll
fail.

The other question is in the incoming direction from an older VM;
you'll have a kvm clock created here, but you won't load the kvm clock
state from the migration stream - what is this clock going to do?

Dave

> >
> >>          sysbus_create_simple(TYPE_KVM_CLOCK, -1, NULL);
> >>      }
> >>  }
> >> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
> >> index 4a8b3a41c1bc..20b31b65307b 100644
> >> --- a/target/i386/kvm.c
> >> +++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
> >> @@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ bool kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable(void)
> >>      return (ret == KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +bool kvm_has_adjust_clock(void)
> >> +{
> >> +    return kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ADJUST_CLOCK);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  bool kvm_has_exception_payload(void)
> >>  {
> >>      return has_exception_payload;
> >> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm_i386.h b/target/i386/kvm_i386.h
> >> index 064b8798a26c..0fce4e51d2d6 100644
> >> --- a/target/i386/kvm_i386.h
> >> +++ b/target/i386/kvm_i386.h
> >> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> >>  
> >>  bool kvm_allows_irq0_override(void);
> >>  bool kvm_has_smm(void);
> >> +bool kvm_has_adjust_clock(void);
> >>  bool kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable(void);
> >>  bool kvm_has_exception_payload(void);
> >>  void kvm_synchronize_all_tsc(void);
> >> -- 
> >> 2.25.4
> >> 
> >> 
> 
> -- 
> Vitaly
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK