qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: "Kang, Luwei" <luwei.kang@intel.com>
Cc: "Strong, Beeman" <beeman.strong@intel.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>,
	"rth@twiddle.net" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Remove the limitation of Intel PT CPUID info
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 12:50:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200921165028.GP57321@habkost.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR11MB14473A594C244A5B403ADC26803A0@CY4PR11MB1447.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:49:22AM +0000, Kang, Luwei wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>     This patch set will remove some limitations of Intel PT CPUID information.
>     1. The "IP payloads" feature will disable the Intel PT in guests and it will be coming soon.
>     2. To make the live migration safe, we set the Intel PT CPUID as a constant value(Icelake server CPUID). It will mask off the new feature of Intel PT.

Isn't this series doing the opposite of 2?  It replaces all
constant CPUID values with kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid(), making
the feature unavailable in migration-safe mode.

Does it mean the plan is to drop intel-pt migration support
entirely?

> 
>     About this issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853972, Intel PT is disabled in the guest by default, we should use "-cpu Icelake-Server,+intel-pt" to enable the Intel PT.

That's correct.  The point of the BZ is that libvirt
mode=host-model was expected to include intel-pt automatically
when available.  With this series, the request in the BZ stops
making sense (because intel-pt won't be migration-safe anymore),
but I'm not sure yet that's really the plan.


> 
> Thanks,
> Luwei Kang
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2020 6:03 AM
> > To: Kang, Luwei <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> > Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com; rth@twiddle.net; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Strong,
> > Beeman <beeman.strong@intel.com>; Jiri Denemark
> > <jdenemar@redhat.com>; Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Remove the limitation of Intel PT CPUID info
> > 
> > Hi Luwei Kang,
> > 
> > I was looking for info on intel-pt and just saw this series, and it was never
> > reviewed or merged (sorry for missing it!).  Is this still the approach we want to
> > follow for intel-pt?
> > 
> > I'm CCing Jiri Denemark because this might be relevant for a libvirt issue related
> > to intel-pt we were investigating[1].
> > 
> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1853972
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:56:09AM +0000, Kang, Luwei wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Kang, Luwei <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 5:38 AM
> > > > To: pbonzini@redhat.com; rth@twiddle.net; ehabkost@redhat.com
> > > > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Strong, Beeman
> > <beeman.strong@intel.com>;
> > > > Kang, Luwei <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] Remove the limitation of Intel PT CPUID info
> > > >
> > > > The Intel PT feature includes some
> > > > sub-features(CPUID.(EAX=14H,ECX=0H))
> > > > and these sub-features are different on different HW platforms. To
> > > > make the live migration safety(get the same CPUID info with same cpu
> > > > model on different HW platform), the current Intel PT CPUID
> > > > information is set to a constant value(from ICELAKE Server).
> > > >
> > > > It will block the new feature in the later HW platform. what's more,
> > > > the support of "IP payloads" will disable the Intel PT in KVM
> > > > guest(patch 1) but it will come soon.
> > > >
> > > > This patchset remove this limitation and expose all the capabilities
> > > > to KVM guest. As it will break the live migration safe, Intel PT
> > > > will be masked as unmigratable.
> > >
> > > Ping.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Luwei Kang
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Luwei Kang (3):
> > > >   i386: Remove the limitation of IP payloads for Intel PT
> > > >   i386: Remove the CPUID limitation of Intel PT
> > > >   i386: Mark the 'INTEL_PT' CPUID bit as unmigratable
> > > >
> > > >  target/i386/cpu.c | 69
> > > > ++++---------------------------------------------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 1.8.3.1
> > >
> > 
> > --
> > Eduardo
> 

-- 
Eduardo



  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-21 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-24 21:38 [PATCH v1 0/3] Remove the limitation of Intel PT CPUID info Luwei Kang
2020-02-24 21:38 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] i386: Remove the limitation of IP payloads for Intel PT Luwei Kang
2020-09-25 16:15   ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-25 16:42     ` Strong, Beeman
2020-09-25 16:54       ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-25 20:23         ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-25 20:29           ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-25 20:40             ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28  5:19               ` Kang, Luwei
2020-09-28  7:35                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-28 12:42                   ` Kang, Luwei
2020-09-28 14:12                     ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-29  2:28                       ` Kang, Luwei
2020-09-29  3:44                         ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-28 16:46                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-29  2:28                       ` Kang, Luwei
2020-02-24 21:38 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] i386: Remove the CPUID limitation of " Luwei Kang
2020-02-24 21:38 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] i386: Mark the 'INTEL_PT' CPUID bit as unmigratable Luwei Kang
2020-03-30  9:56 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] Remove the limitation of Intel PT CPUID info Kang, Luwei
2020-09-18 22:02   ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-21  7:49     ` Kang, Luwei
2020-09-21 16:50       ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2020-09-23  2:52         ` Kang, Luwei
2020-09-23 14:15           ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-24 12:47             ` Kang, Luwei
2020-09-24 13:34               ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-25  8:20                 ` Kang, Luwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200921165028.GP57321@habkost.net \
    --to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=beeman.strong@intel.com \
    --cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
    --cc=luwei.kang@intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).