* [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available
@ 2020-09-22 20:19 Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] i386/kvm: Require KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING Eduardo Habkost
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Habkost @ 2020-09-22 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Sergio Lopez, kvm, Michael S. Tsirkin, Marcelo Tosatti,
Paolo Bonzini, Richard Henderson, Eduardo Habkost
KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING is available since 2019 (Linux v2.6.30), so
we can safely assume it's always present and remove some runtime
checks.
Eduardo Habkost (3):
i386/kvm: Require KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
i386/kvm: Remove IRQ routing support checks
i386/kvm: Delete kvm_allows_irq0_override()
target/i386/kvm_i386.h | 1 -
hw/i386/fw_cfg.c | 2 +-
hw/i386/kvm/apic.c | 5 ++---
hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
hw/i386/microvm.c | 2 +-
hw/i386/pc.c | 2 +-
target/i386/kvm-stub.c | 5 -----
target/i386/kvm.c | 17 +++++------------
8 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] i386/kvm: Require KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
2020-09-22 20:19 [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available Eduardo Habkost
@ 2020-09-22 20:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] i386/kvm: Remove IRQ routing support checks Eduardo Habkost
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Habkost @ 2020-09-22 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Sergio Lopez, kvm, Michael S. Tsirkin, Marcelo Tosatti,
Paolo Bonzini, Richard Henderson, Eduardo Habkost
KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING is available since 2009 (Linux v2.6.30), so
it's safe to just make it a requirement on x86.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
target/i386/kvm.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
index 9efb07e7c83..d884ff1b071 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
@@ -2129,6 +2129,11 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
int ret;
struct utsname utsname;
+ if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING)) {
+ error_report("kvm: KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING not supported by KVM");
+ return -ENOTSUP;
+ }
+
has_xsave = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_XSAVE);
has_xcrs = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_XCRS);
has_pit_state2 = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_PIT_STATE2);
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] i386/kvm: Remove IRQ routing support checks
2020-09-22 20:19 [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] i386/kvm: Require KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING Eduardo Habkost
@ 2020-09-22 20:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] i386/kvm: Delete kvm_allows_irq0_override() Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-23 12:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available Paolo Bonzini
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Habkost @ 2020-09-22 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Sergio Lopez, kvm, Michael S. Tsirkin, Marcelo Tosatti,
Paolo Bonzini, Richard Henderson, Eduardo Habkost
KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING is always available on x86, so replace checks
for kvm_has_gsi_routing() and KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING with asserts.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
hw/i386/kvm/apic.c | 5 ++---
hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
target/i386/kvm.c | 7 -------
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/apic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/apic.c
index 4eb2d77b87b..dd29906061c 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvm/apic.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvm/apic.c
@@ -225,9 +225,8 @@ static void kvm_apic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
memory_region_init_io(&s->io_memory, OBJECT(s), &kvm_apic_io_ops, s,
"kvm-apic-msi", APIC_SPACE_SIZE);
- if (kvm_has_gsi_routing()) {
- msi_nonbroken = true;
- }
+ assert(kvm_has_gsi_routing());
+ msi_nonbroken = true;
}
static void kvm_apic_unrealize(DeviceState *dev)
diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
index c5528df942a..dfc3c980057 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c
@@ -25,27 +25,26 @@ void kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(bool pci_enabled)
KVMState *s = kvm_state;
int i;
- if (kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING)) {
- for (i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
- if (i == 2) {
- continue;
- }
- kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_PIC_MASTER, i);
- }
- for (i = 8; i < 16; ++i) {
- kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_PIC_SLAVE, i - 8);
+ assert(kvm_has_gsi_routing());
+ for (i = 0; i < 8; ++i) {
+ if (i == 2) {
+ continue;
}
- if (pci_enabled) {
- for (i = 0; i < 24; ++i) {
- if (i == 0) {
- kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, 2);
- } else if (i != 2) {
- kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, i);
- }
+ kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_PIC_MASTER, i);
+ }
+ for (i = 8; i < 16; ++i) {
+ kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_PIC_SLAVE, i - 8);
+ }
+ if (pci_enabled) {
+ for (i = 0; i < 24; ++i) {
+ if (i == 0) {
+ kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, 2);
+ } else if (i != 2) {
+ kvm_irqchip_add_irq_route(s, i, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, i);
}
}
- kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(s);
}
+ kvm_irqchip_commit_routes(s);
}
typedef struct KVMIOAPICState KVMIOAPICState;
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
index d884ff1b071..cf6dc90f7c5 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
@@ -4558,13 +4558,6 @@ bool kvm_arch_stop_on_emulation_error(CPUState *cs)
void kvm_arch_init_irq_routing(KVMState *s)
{
- if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING)) {
- /* If kernel can't do irq routing, interrupt source
- * override 0->2 cannot be set up as required by HPET.
- * So we have to disable it.
- */
- no_hpet = 1;
- }
/* We know at this point that we're using the in-kernel
* irqchip, so we can use irqfds, and on x86 we know
* we can use msi via irqfd and GSI routing.
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] i386/kvm: Delete kvm_allows_irq0_override()
2020-09-22 20:19 [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] i386/kvm: Require KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] i386/kvm: Remove IRQ routing support checks Eduardo Habkost
@ 2020-09-22 20:19 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-23 12:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available Paolo Bonzini
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eduardo Habkost @ 2020-09-22 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Sergio Lopez, kvm, Michael S. Tsirkin, Marcelo Tosatti,
Paolo Bonzini, Richard Henderson, Eduardo Habkost
As IRQ routing is always available on x86,
kvm_allows_irq0_override() will always return true, so we don't
need the function anymore.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
target/i386/kvm_i386.h | 1 -
hw/i386/fw_cfg.c | 2 +-
hw/i386/microvm.c | 2 +-
hw/i386/pc.c | 2 +-
target/i386/kvm-stub.c | 5 -----
target/i386/kvm.c | 5 -----
6 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm_i386.h b/target/i386/kvm_i386.h
index 064b8798a26..b11704cc772 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm_i386.h
+++ b/target/i386/kvm_i386.h
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
#endif /* CONFIG_KVM */
-bool kvm_allows_irq0_override(void);
bool kvm_has_smm(void);
bool kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable(void);
bool kvm_has_exception_payload(void);
diff --git a/hw/i386/fw_cfg.c b/hw/i386/fw_cfg.c
index 33441ad4840..e06579490c4 100644
--- a/hw/i386/fw_cfg.c
+++ b/hw/i386/fw_cfg.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ FWCfgState *fw_cfg_arch_create(MachineState *ms,
fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_ACPI_TABLES,
acpi_tables, acpi_tables_len);
#endif
- fw_cfg_add_i32(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_IRQ0_OVERRIDE, kvm_allows_irq0_override());
+ fw_cfg_add_i32(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_IRQ0_OVERRIDE, 1);
fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_E820_TABLE,
&e820_reserve, sizeof(e820_reserve));
diff --git a/hw/i386/microvm.c b/hw/i386/microvm.c
index 60d32722301..05fb0536dcc 100644
--- a/hw/i386/microvm.c
+++ b/hw/i386/microvm.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static void microvm_memory_init(MicrovmMachineState *mms)
fw_cfg_add_i16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_NB_CPUS, machine->smp.cpus);
fw_cfg_add_i16(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS, machine->smp.max_cpus);
fw_cfg_add_i64(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_RAM_SIZE, (uint64_t)machine->ram_size);
- fw_cfg_add_i32(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_IRQ0_OVERRIDE, kvm_allows_irq0_override());
+ fw_cfg_add_i32(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_IRQ0_OVERRIDE, 1);
fw_cfg_add_bytes(fw_cfg, FW_CFG_E820_TABLE,
&e820_reserve, sizeof(e820_reserve));
fw_cfg_add_file(fw_cfg, "etc/e820", e820_table,
diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index b55369357e5..0bc569d4c6b 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ void pc_guest_info_init(PCMachineState *pcms)
MachineState *ms = MACHINE(pcms);
X86MachineState *x86ms = X86_MACHINE(pcms);
- x86ms->apic_xrupt_override = kvm_allows_irq0_override();
+ x86ms->apic_xrupt_override = true;
pcms->numa_nodes = ms->numa_state->num_nodes;
pcms->node_mem = g_malloc0(pcms->numa_nodes *
sizeof *pcms->node_mem);
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm-stub.c b/target/i386/kvm-stub.c
index 872ef7df4c8..92f49121b8f 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm-stub.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm-stub.c
@@ -13,11 +13,6 @@
#include "cpu.h"
#include "kvm_i386.h"
-bool kvm_allows_irq0_override(void)
-{
- return 1;
-}
-
#ifndef __OPTIMIZE__
bool kvm_has_smm(void)
{
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
index cf6dc90f7c5..c419c52ec58 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
@@ -148,11 +148,6 @@ bool kvm_has_exception_payload(void)
return has_exception_payload;
}
-bool kvm_allows_irq0_override(void)
-{
- return !kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() || kvm_has_gsi_routing();
-}
-
static bool kvm_x2apic_api_set_flags(uint64_t flags)
{
KVMState *s = KVM_STATE(current_accel());
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available
2020-09-22 20:19 [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available Eduardo Habkost
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] i386/kvm: Delete kvm_allows_irq0_override() Eduardo Habkost
@ 2020-09-23 12:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-09-23 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eduardo Habkost, qemu-devel
Cc: Sergio Lopez, kvm, Michael S. Tsirkin, Marcelo Tosatti,
Richard Henderson
On 22/09/20 22:19, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING is available since 2019 (Linux v2.6.30), so
> we can safely assume it's always present and remove some runtime
> checks.
>
> Eduardo Habkost (3):
> i386/kvm: Require KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
> i386/kvm: Remove IRQ routing support checks
> i386/kvm: Delete kvm_allows_irq0_override()
>
> target/i386/kvm_i386.h | 1 -
> hw/i386/fw_cfg.c | 2 +-
> hw/i386/kvm/apic.c | 5 ++---
> hw/i386/kvm/ioapic.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> hw/i386/microvm.c | 2 +-
> hw/i386/pc.c | 2 +-
> target/i386/kvm-stub.c | 5 -----
> target/i386/kvm.c | 17 +++++------------
> 8 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-23 12:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-22 20:19 [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] i386/kvm: Require KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] i386/kvm: Remove IRQ routing support checks Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-22 20:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] i386/kvm: Delete kvm_allows_irq0_override() Eduardo Habkost
2020-09-23 12:43 ` [PATCH 0/3] i386/kvm: Assume IRQ routing is always available Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).