From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8003AC4363D for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86CBF207C4 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="PmpgyupS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 86CBF207C4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48408 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLkI3-00068Z-GO for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 05:45:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLkEN-0003I9-8f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 05:41:35 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:48362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLkEI-00030D-Fh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 05:41:29 -0400 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601026884; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uG3mT3mIsHXGo/NZ/lagLrVrCF3W5tB7wbo/eGmR8/8=; b=PmpgyupSu35N1SPu+dkogfunpTlIr1cwLyQLjxU46G7c9t8XDtKJOJro4kJyh0P5l+2qoS KhnPzN9sHVvnmBt9B4OFXj8tDJ2TpX8K4KTQnFUX1L4hEilIUaaWVFUIMUMBHOJS0vL61+ lYgMA0e55MZUfqWYgkcsfUAyMtjgAwI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-188-tQR-5GWWO-Cpe9fjmIx9og-1; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 05:41:22 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tQR-5GWWO-Cpe9fjmIx9og-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95BA1186DD46; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin (ovpn-112-192.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.192]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD8755786; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:41:05 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Matthew Rosato Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] s390x/pci: use a PCI Group structure Message-ID: <20200925114105.439c1c7d.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1600529672-10243-5-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> References: <1600529672-10243-1-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> <1600529672-10243-5-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=cohuck@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/25 01:07:33 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -32 X-Spam_score: -3.3 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.199, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thuth@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 11:34:29 -0400 Matthew Rosato wrote: > From: Pierre Morel > > We use a S390PCIGroup structure to hold the information related to a > zPCI Function group. > > This allows us to be ready to support multiple groups and to retrieve > the group information from the host. > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel > Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato > --- > hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 10 ++++++++++ > hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- > 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c > index 92146a2..3015d86 100644 > --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c > +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c > @@ -737,6 +737,46 @@ static void s390_pci_iommu_free(S390pciState *s, PCIBus *bus, int32_t devfn) > object_unref(OBJECT(iommu)); > } > > +static S390PCIGroup *s390_grp_create(int ug) I think you made the identifiers a bit too compact :) s390_group_create() is not that long, and I have no idea what the 'ug' (ugh :) parameter is supposed to mean. > +{ > + S390PCIGroup *grp; group? > + S390pciState *s = s390_get_phb(); > + > + grp = g_new0(S390PCIGroup, 1); > + grp->ug = ug; > + QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&s->zpci_grps, grp, link); zpci_groups? I think you get the idea :) > + return grp; > +} (...) No objection to the patch in general.