Re: [PATCH 3/7] s390x/pci: create a header dedicated to PCI CLP

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:10:12 -0400
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 9/25/20 5:17 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 11:34:28 -0400
> > Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> To have a clean separation between s390-pci-bus.h and s390-pci-inst.h
> >> headers we export the PCI CLP instructions in a dedicated header.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>   hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h  |   1 +
> >>   hw/s390x/s390-pci-clp.h  | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h | 196 -------------------------------------------
> >>   3 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)
> >>   create mode 100644 hw/s390x/s390-pci-clp.h  
> > 
> > Looks sane; but I wonder whether we should move the stuff under
> > include/hw/s390x/.
> >   
> 
> Probably.  I'd be fine with creating this file under include, but if 
> we're going to do that we should plan to move the other s390-pci* ones 
> too.  For this patchset, I can change this patch to put the new header 
> in include/hw/s390x, easy enough.
> 
> I'll plan to do a separate cleanup patchset to move s390-pci-bus.h and 
> s390-pci-inst.h.
> 
> How would you like me to handle s390-pci-vfio.h (this is a new file 
> added by both this patch set and 's390x/pci: Accomodate vfio DMA 
> limiting') --  It seems likely that the latter patch set will merge 
> first, so my thought would be to avoid a cleanup on this one and just 
> re-send 's390x/pci: Accomodate vfio DMA limiting' once the kernel part 
> hits mainline (it's currently in linux-next via Alex) with 
> s390-pci-vfio.h also created in include/hw/s390x (and I guess the 
> MAINTAINERS hit for it too). Sound OK?

Yes, I guess that would be best.