Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:13:49 -0400
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Collin Walling wrote:
> > On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> >   
> >>>  
> >>
> >> Thanks, applied.
> >>
> >>  
> > 
> > Thanks Conny.
> > 
> > Much appreciated for everyone's patience and review. The only thing I'd
> > like to hold out on for now is for someone to take a peek at patch #3
> > with respect to the protected virtualization stuff. I don't know too
> > much about it, honestly, and I want to ensure that dynamically
> > allocating memory for the SCCB makes sense there. The alternative would
> > be to allocate a static 4K for the work_sccb.
> >   
> 
> I had someone take a look at the patch for PV and was told everything
> looks sane. Since the patches have already been applied, it seems like
> it's too late to add a reviewed-by from someone?

Have the reviewer reply with their R-b, and I'll happily add it, as I
rebase s390-next before doing a pull req anyway :)

> 
> Either way: thanks to everyone for the journey on getting these patches
> through!
>