From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Berger" <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 07/13] device_core: use drain_call_rcu in in qmp_device_add
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:38:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201006123904.610658-8-mlevitsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201006123904.610658-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Soon, a device removal might only happen on RCU callback execution.
This is okay for device-del which provides a DEVICE_DELETED event,
but not for the failure case of device-add. To avoid changing
monitor semantics, just drain all pending RCU callbacks on error.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200913160259.32145-4-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
[Don't use it in qmp_device_del. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
qdev-monitor.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/qdev-monitor.c b/qdev-monitor.c
index e9b7228480..bcfb90a08f 100644
--- a/qdev-monitor.c
+++ b/qdev-monitor.c
@@ -803,6 +803,18 @@ void qmp_device_add(QDict *qdict, QObject **ret_data, Error **errp)
return;
}
dev = qdev_device_add(opts, errp);
+
+ /*
+ * Drain all pending RCU callbacks. This is done because
+ * some bus related operations can delay a device removal
+ * (in this case this can happen if device is added and then
+ * removed due to a configuration error)
+ * to a RCU callback, but user might expect that this interface
+ * will finish its job completely once qmp command returns result
+ * to the user
+ */
+ drain_call_rcu();
+
if (!dev) {
qemu_opts_del(opts);
return;
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-06 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-06 12:38 [PATCH v7 00/13] Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:38 ` [PATCH v7 01/13] qtest: rename qtest_qmp_receive to qtest_qmp_receive_dict Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-12 11:13 ` Thomas Huth
2020-10-06 12:38 ` [PATCH v7 02/13] qtest: Reintroduce qtest_qmp_receive Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-12 11:14 ` Thomas Huth
2020-10-12 13:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-12 13:49 ` Thomas Huth
2020-10-12 16:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-06 12:38 ` [PATCH v7 03/13] qtest: switch users back to qtest_qmp_receive Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-06 13:17 ` Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:38 ` [PATCH v7 04/13] qdev: add "check if address free" callback for buses Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:38 ` [PATCH v7 05/13] scsi: switch to bus->check_address Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:38 ` [PATCH v7 06/13] scsi/scsi_bus: switch search direction in scsi_device_find Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:38 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2020-10-06 12:38 ` [PATCH v7 08/13] device-core: use RCU for list of children of a bus Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 09/13] device-core: use atomic_set on .realized property Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 10/13] scsi/scsi-bus: scsi_device_find: don't return unrealized devices Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 11/13] scsi/scsi_bus: Add scsi_device_get Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 12/13] virtio-scsi: use scsi_device_get Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 12:39 ` [PATCH v7 13/13] scsi/scsi_bus: fix races in REPORT LUNS Maxim Levitsky
2020-10-06 13:01 ` [PATCH v7 00/13] Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201006123904.610658-8-mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).