qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Elena Afanasova <eafanasova@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, jasowang@redhat.com,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/net: move allocation to the heap due to very large stack frame
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:30:01 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201012053001.GD4787@yekko.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f505c80b88ee665a62883a69bed9d614f6ba2a66.camel@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2267 bytes --]

On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 08:53:00AM -0700, Elena Afanasova wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 17:07 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 07:02:56AM -0700, Elena Afanasova wrote:
> > > > From 09905773a00e417d3a37c12350d9e55466fdce8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > > > 2001
> > > From: Elena Afanasova <eafanasova@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 06:41:36 -0700
> > > Subject: [PATCH] hw/net: move allocation to the heap due to very
> > > large stack
> > >  frame
> > 
> > Patch looks fine, but some more details of the motivation would be
> > nice.  I wouldn't have thought that the size of a network packet
> > counted as a "very large" stack frame by userspace standards.
> > 
> 
> gcc with wstack-usage warns that stack frame size may be ~65Kbytes

AFAICT, -Wstack-usage takes a parameter giving what size it will
complain about.  What was that value, and what was the rationale for
choosing it?

> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Elena Afanasova <eafanasova@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  hw/net/spapr_llan.c | 5 +++--
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/net/spapr_llan.c b/hw/net/spapr_llan.c
> > > index 2093f1bad0..581320a0e7 100644
> > > --- a/hw/net/spapr_llan.c
> > > +++ b/hw/net/spapr_llan.c
> > > @@ -688,7 +688,8 @@ static target_ulong
> > > h_send_logical_lan(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > >      SpaprVioDevice *sdev = spapr_vio_find_by_reg(spapr->vio_bus,
> > > reg);
> > >      SpaprVioVlan *dev = VIO_SPAPR_VLAN_DEVICE(sdev);
> > >      unsigned total_len;
> > > -    uint8_t *lbuf, *p;
> > > +    uint8_t *p;
> > > +    g_autofree uint8_t *lbuf = NULL;
> > >      int i, nbufs;
> > >      int ret;
> > >  
> > > @@ -729,7 +730,7 @@ static target_ulong
> > > h_send_logical_lan(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> > >          return H_RESOURCE;
> > >      }
> > >  
> > > -    lbuf = alloca(total_len);
> > > +    lbuf = g_malloc(total_len);
> > >      p = lbuf;
> > >      for (i = 0; i < nbufs; i++) {
> > >          ret = spapr_vio_dma_read(sdev, VLAN_BD_ADDR(bufs[i]),
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-12  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-09 14:02 [PATCH] hw/net: move allocation to the heap due to very large stack frame Elena Afanasova
2020-10-09 14:14 ` Richard Henderson
2020-10-09 14:25 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-10-09 14:48 ` Greg Kurz
2020-10-09 14:55 ` Li Qiang
2020-10-10  6:07 ` David Gibson
2020-10-10 15:53   ` Elena Afanasova
2020-10-12  5:30     ` David Gibson [this message]
2020-10-12 10:44       ` Thomas Huth
2020-10-12 13:45         ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-10-13  5:32           ` David Gibson
2020-10-14 14:15             ` Elena Afanasova
2020-10-16  0:32               ` David Gibson
2020-10-11  2:23   ` Li Qiang
2020-10-12  5:28     ` David Gibson
2020-10-12 11:09   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-10-12 11:48     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201012053001.GD4787@yekko.fritz.box \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=eafanasova@gmail.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).