qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	peterx@redhat.com, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] migration/postcopy: Sync faulted addresses after network recovered
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 18:57:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019225720.172743-1-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)

This is v5 of the series.  Probably my first series that got queued/unqueued
twice.

I found a bug in v4 that was about page sizes, however that didn't match with
PeterM's report on big endian hosts.  My manual reproduce on s390x also didn't
reproduce.  However after I ran the tree (with the fix) on travis (thanks
Thomas for suggesting this!) I noticed that s390x passed the test too:

https://travis-ci.com/github/xzpeter/qemu/builds/191031111

I still got two tests that got timed out, however I also noticed that the
master branch got similarly two tests that timed out:

https://travis-ci.com/github/xzpeter/qemu/builds/191012879

There's one difference on the failed test, however I really suspect it's
because the uncertainly of the travis host scheduling the tests, or the master
failures should really be a subset of my own branch (while it's not).

So I decided to give it a 3rd shot... PeterM: would it be easy/possible to kick
the CI again against this series for pulls?  I just don't want to break Dave's
pull the 3rd time. :)

I also picked up the other patch [1] that should also fix some rare failures on
postcopy recovery.  However I bet we haven't yet encounter it, at least not often.

v5 changelog:
- added one test patch for easier debugging for migration-test
- added one fix patch [1] for another postcopy race
- fixed a bug that could trigger when host/guest page size differs

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20201007183324.288379-1-peterx@redhat.com/

--------- v4 cover letter --------------

v4:
- use "void */ulong" instead of "uint64_t" where proper in patch 3/4 [Dave]

v3:
- fix build on 32bit hosts & rebase
- remove r-bs for the last 2 patches for Dave due to the changes

v2:
- add r-bs for Dave
- add patch "migration: Properly destroy variables on incoming side" as patch 1
- destroy page_request_mutex in migration_incoming_state_destroy() too [Dave]
- use WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD in two places where we can [Dave]

We've seen conditional guest hangs on destination VM after postcopy recovered.
However the hang will resolve itself after a few minutes.

The problem is: after a postcopy recovery, the prioritized postcopy queue on
the source VM is actually missing.  So all the faulted threads before the
postcopy recovery happened will keep halted until (accidentally) the page got
copied by the background precopy migration stream.

The solution is to also refresh this information after postcopy recovery.  To
achieve this, we need to maintain a list of faulted addresses on the
destination node, so that we can resend the list when necessary.  This work is
done via patch 2-5.

With that, the last thing we need to do is to send this extra information to
source VM after recovered.  Very luckily, this synchronization can be
"emulated" by sending a bunch of page requests (although these pages have been
sent previously!) to source VM just like when we've got a page fault.  Even in
the 1st version of the postcopy code we'll handle duplicated pages well.  So
this fix does not even need a new capability bit and it'll work smoothly on old
QEMUs when we migrate from them to the new QEMUs.

Please review, thanks.

Peter Xu (6):
  migration: Pass incoming state into qemu_ufd_copy_ioctl()
  migration: Introduce migrate_send_rp_message_req_pages()
  migration: Maintain postcopy faulted addresses
  migration: Sync requested pages after postcopy recovery
  migration/postcopy: Release fd before going into 'postcopy-pause'
  migration-test: Only hide error if !QTEST_LOG

 migration/migration.c        | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 migration/migration.h        | 21 ++++++++++++-
 migration/postcopy-ram.c     | 25 ++++++++++++----
 migration/savevm.c           | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 migration/trace-events       |  3 ++
 tests/qtest/migration-test.c |  6 +++-
 6 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2




             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-19 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-19 22:57 Peter Xu [this message]
2020-10-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] migration: Pass incoming state into qemu_ufd_copy_ioctl() Peter Xu
2020-10-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] migration: Introduce migrate_send_rp_message_req_pages() Peter Xu
2020-10-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] migration: Maintain postcopy faulted addresses Peter Xu
2020-10-21 14:23   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-10-21 15:50     ` Peter Xu
2020-10-21 17:42       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-10-21 18:04         ` Peter Xu
2020-10-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] migration: Sync requested pages after postcopy recovery Peter Xu
2020-10-21 14:37   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-10-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] migration/postcopy: Release fd before going into 'postcopy-pause' Peter Xu
2020-10-21 18:56   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-10-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] migration-test: Only hide error if !QTEST_LOG Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201019225720.172743-1-peterx@redhat.com \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).