From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>
Cc: David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>,
Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>,
qemu devel list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Refuse to hotplug PCI Devices when the Guest OS is not ready
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:54:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201023115029-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC_L=vUh8LU5c8c00OhnbEiW7EzZFWKU61vOdub7c11wDMXeRg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 09:47:14AM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 6:49 AM David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:01:04 -0400
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 05:50:51PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >Â [...]Â
> >
> > Right. After detecting just failing unconditionally it a bit too
> > simplistic IMHO.
>
> There's also another factor here, which I thought I'd mentioned
> already, but looks like I didn't: I think we're still missing some
> details in what's going on.
>
> The premise for this patch is that plugging while the indicator is in
> transition state is allowed to fail in any way on the guest side. I
> don't think that's a reasonable interpretation, because it's unworkable
> for physical hotplug. If the indicator starts blinking while you're in
> the middle of shoving a card in, you'd be in trouble.
>
> So, what I'm assuming here is that while "don't plug while blinking" is
> the instruction for the operator to obey as best they can, on the guest
> side the rule has to be "start blinking, wait a while and by the time
> you leave blinking state again, you can be confident any plugs or
> unplugs have completed". Obviously still racy in the strict computer
> science sense, but about the best you can do with slow humans in the
> mix.
>
> So, qemu should of course endeavour to follow that rule as though it
> was a human operator on a physical machine and not plug when the
> indicator is blinking. *But* the qemu plug will in practice be fast
> enough that if we're hitting real problems here, it suggests the guest
> is still doing something wrong.
>
>
> I personally think there is a little bit of over-engineering here.
> Let's start with the spec:
>
> Â Â Power Indicator Blinking
> Â Â A blinking Power Indicator indicates that the slot is powering up or
> powering down and that
> Â Â insertion or removal of the adapter is not permitted.
>
> What exactly is an interpretation here?
> As you stated, the races are theoretical, the whole point of the indicator
> is to let the operator know he can't plug the device just yet.
>
> I understand it would be more user friendly if the QEMU would wait internally
> for the
> blinking to end, but the whole point of the indicator is to let the operatorÂ
> (human or machine)
> know they can't plug the device at a specific time.
> Should QEMU take the responsibility of the operator? Is it even correct?
>
> Even if we would want such a feature, how is it related to this patch?
> The patch simply refuses to start a hotplug operation when it knows it will not
> succeed.Â
> Â
> Another way that would make sense to me would be is a new QEMU interface other
> than
> "add_device", let's say "adding_device_allowed", that would return true if the
> hotplug is allowed
> at this point of time. (I am aware of the theoretical races)Â
Rather than adding_device_allowed, something like "query slot"
might be helpful for debugging. That would help user figure out
e.g. why isn't device visible without any races.
> The above will at least mimic the mechanics of the pyhs world. The operator
> looks at the indicator,
> the management software checks if adding the device is allowed.
> Since it is a corner case I would prefer the device_add to fail rather than
> introducing a new interface,
> but that's just me.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcel
>
I think we want QEMU management interface to be reasonably
abstract and agnostic if possible. Pushing knowledge of hardware
detail to management will just lead to pain IMHO.
We supported device_add which practically never fails for years,
at this point it's easier to keep supporting it than
change all users ...
>
> --
> David Gibson <dgibson@redhat.com>
> Principal Software Engineer, Virtualization, Red Hat
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-23 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-22 11:40 [PATCH] pci: Refuse to hotplug PCI Devices when the Guest OS is not ready Marcel Apfelbaum
2020-10-22 12:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-22 12:56 ` David Gibson
2020-10-22 13:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-23 3:30 ` David Gibson
2020-10-22 13:55 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2020-10-22 14:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-22 14:10 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2020-10-22 14:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-22 14:50 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2020-10-22 15:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-23 3:49 ` David Gibson
2020-10-23 6:47 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2020-10-23 15:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-10-23 17:27 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-10-26 6:38 ` David Gibson
2020-10-26 9:17 ` Peter Krempa
2020-10-26 6:35 ` David Gibson
2020-10-23 6:26 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2020-10-26 6:45 ` David Gibson
2020-10-27 11:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-27 12:54 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-10-27 13:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-28 3:34 ` David Gibson
2020-10-28 3:31 ` David Gibson
2020-10-28 15:39 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-10-28 17:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-27 11:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-10-23 3:31 ` David Gibson
2020-11-11 12:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-11-15 16:48 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2020-11-11 16:09 ` Roman Kagan
2020-11-15 16:43 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201023115029-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).