From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140E1C388F9 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB4922283 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="O1AJpHuh" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7DB4922283 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57378 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXQS5-0003g2-AW for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:59:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43714) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXPqr-0006ET-3T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:21:29 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:59554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXPqo-0008A7-Ee for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:21:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1603808483; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=bfbWGSjCkq1lSlf3EPHLeT8EwFANleLl+fyQz3OJpyk=; b=O1AJpHuhoRFWaeXjBiO+cvnmt+m4U+yCOva+sERkQGaYe+izzSmXZkQxcXM+L8nrI8gUpy duXsZOqdHPrXx6mgaNnAOaWUSZPDFwBaZkgA+7sIjDFusHPiz4519iGVtp37+ro+c/K/VD KCS3GUm7Pq1AzHUsQOT9dxDcKMVG6Y4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-321-t0kawjb6MV25LBumJtBBFg-1; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:21:11 -0400 X-MC-Unique: t0kawjb6MV25LBumJtBBFg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DEBA10E2183; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-115-46.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.46]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91BEF19647; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:20:55 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Stefan Hajnoczi Subject: Re: [RFC] Using gitlab for upstream qemu repo? Message-ID: <20201027142055.GD529052@redhat.com> References: <672b8aa0-2128-23e1-b778-01a4d96b209d@redhat.com> <20201027140818.GC102411@stefanha-x1.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201027140818.GC102411@stefanha-x1.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/27 01:06:06 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Richard Henderson , Mark Cave-Ayland , Michael Roth , qemu-devel , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , kraxel@redhat.com, "Justin M. Forbes" , Paolo Bonzini , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Andreas Faerber Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 02:08:18PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:04:06AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 at 17:48, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > now that Gitlab is the primary CI infrastructure for QEMU, and that all > > > QEMU git repositories (including mirrors) are available on Gitlab, I > > > would like to propose that committers use Gitlab when merging commits to > > > QEMU repositories. > > > > > Nothing would change for developers, who would still have access to all > > > three sets of repositories (git.qemu.org, gitlab.com and github.com). > > > Committers however would need to have an account on the > > > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project organization with access to the > > > repositories they care about. They would also lose write access to > > > /srv/git on qemu.org. > > > > Yes, this makes sense. Who in practice does it actually affect? > > For the main qemu.git repo, my guess is just me, Michael Roth > > for the stable branches, plus Richard H and Stefan H who both > > volunteered to do a turn on the merge-handling rota once we > > eventually get it set up to not depend on my ad-hoc CI setup. > > > > I have a gitlab account so I'm set for this. Michael, do you > > have an account there and are you OK with switching to doing > > git pushes to the repo on gitlab rather than direct to qemu.org ? > > Here are the users with commit access to qemu.org repos: > > berkeley-softfloat-3 - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > berkeley-testfloat-3 - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > capstone - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > dtc - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > edk2 - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > ipxe - kraxel,lprosek > keycodemapdb - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha Mirroring this on gitlab is a little silly when the primary upstream is already on gitlab :-) https://gitlab.com/keycodemap/keycodemapdb > libslirp - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > meson - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > openbios - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > openhackware - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > opensbi - > qboot - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > qemu - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > qemu-jeos - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > QemuMacDrivers - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > qemu-palcode - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > qemu-stable-0.10 - jforbes,afaerber,mdroth > qemu-stable-0.14 - jforbes,afaerber,mdroth > qemu-stable-0.15 - jforbes,afaerber,mdroth > qemu-stable-1.0 - jforbes,afaerber,mdroth > qemu-stable-1.1 - jforbes,afaerber,mdroth > qemu-stable-1.2 - jforbes,afaerber,mdroth > qemu-stable-1.3 - jforbes,afaerber,mdroth > qemu-stable-1.4 - jforbes,afaerber,mdroth IIUC, the content from these is present in the main qemu.git. Should we mark them "archived" in gitlab, so they're not listed by default as active repos. > qemu-web - paolo,jcody,pmaydell,mdroth,thuth > s390-tools - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > seabios - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > seabios-hppa - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > sgabios - paolo > skiboot - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > SLOF - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > u-boot - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > u-boot-sam460ex - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > vbootrom - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > vgabios - pmaydell,mdroth,stefanha > > Quite a few of those repos are mirrors and actually don't need human > push access. > > The people who need push access are: > * bonzini - qemu-web > * mdroth - qemu-stable > * pmaydell - qemu > * rth - qemu > * stefanha - qemu > * thuth - qemu-web > > Does this sound good? Doesn't mdrooth need 'qemu-web' access for updating the list of releases ? We probably ought to have more than one person with push to qemu-stable, even if mdroth normally does it all, just to improve a bus factor. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|