From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
mst@redhat.com, jusual@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi/crs: Support ranges > 32b for hosts
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:36:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201027153612.35e9faac@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201026193924.985014-2-ben.widawsky@intel.com>
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:39:24 -0700
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> According to PCIe spec 5.0 Type 1 header space Base Address Registers
> are defined by 7.5.1.2.1 Base Address Registers (same as Type 0). The
> _CRS region should allow for the same range (up to 64b). Prior to this
> change, any host bridge utilizing more than 32b for the BAR would have
> the address truncated and likely lead to conflicts when the operating
> systems reads the _CRS object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Looks good to me, so
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
CCing,
Michael to have a send pair of eyes on it
but I wonder how/why ivshm (which might have quite large BAR) works.
PS:
please use git's --cover-letter option to create multi-patch series,
in the future
>
> ---
> I don't think this effects any code currently in QEMU. You'd need to
> have a host bridge which has a BAR, and that BAR wants to be > 32b. I've
> hit this because I have a modified PXB device that does advertise a 64b
> BAR. Also, you'd need a platform that cares about ACPI, which, many do
> not.
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index df13abecf4..75604bdc74 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -789,8 +789,14 @@ static Aml *build_crs(PCIHostState *host, CrsRangeSet *range_set)
> crs_range_insert(temp_range_set.io_ranges,
> range_base, range_limit);
> } else { /* "memory" */
> - crs_range_insert(temp_range_set.mem_ranges,
> - range_base, range_limit);
> + uint64_t length = range_limit - range_base + 1;
> + if (range_limit <= UINT32_MAX && length <= UINT32_MAX) {
> + crs_range_insert(temp_range_set.mem_ranges, range_base,
> + range_limit);
> + } else {
> + crs_range_insert(temp_range_set.mem_64bit_ranges,
> + range_base, range_limit);
> + }
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-27 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-26 19:39 [PATCH 1/2] acpi/crs: Prevent bad ranges for host bridges Ben Widawsky
2020-10-26 19:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] acpi/crs: Support ranges > 32b for hosts Ben Widawsky
2020-10-27 14:36 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]
2020-10-27 15:45 ` Ben Widawsky
2020-10-29 13:57 ` Igor Mammedov
2020-10-29 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi/crs: Prevent bad ranges for host bridges Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201027153612.35e9faac@redhat.com \
--to=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).