[PULL 02/11] test-util-sockets: Correct to set has_abstract, has_tight

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

The code tested doesn't care, which is a bug I will fix shortly.

Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
---
 tests/test-util-sockets.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/test-util-sockets.c b/tests/test-util-sockets.c
index 15da867b8f..9d317e73a6 100644
--- a/tests/test-util-sockets.c
+++ b/tests/test-util-sockets.c
@@ -243,7 +243,9 @@ static gpointer unix_server_thread_func(gpointer user_data)
 
     addr.type = SOCKET_ADDRESS_TYPE_UNIX;
     addr.u.q_unix.path = abstract_sock_name;
+    addr.u.q_unix.has_tight = true;
     addr.u.q_unix.tight = user_data != NULL;
+    addr.u.q_unix.has_abstract = true;
     addr.u.q_unix.abstract = true;
 
     fd = socket_listen(&addr, 1, &err);
@@ -267,7 +269,9 @@ static gpointer unix_client_thread_func(gpointer user_data)
 
     addr.type = SOCKET_ADDRESS_TYPE_UNIX;
     addr.u.q_unix.path = abstract_sock_name;
+    addr.u.q_unix.has_tight = true;
     addr.u.q_unix.tight = user_data != NULL;
+    addr.u.q_unix.has_abstract = true;
     addr.u.q_unix.abstract = true;
 
     fd = socket_connect(&addr, &err);
-- 
2.28.0