From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD0CC00A89 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274442071A for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SpjPrYPs" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 274442071A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:44180 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kadfu-0002Zg-VR for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 06:43:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kadfC-00029D-PA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 06:42:46 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:37291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kadfA-0004uR-Ts for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 06:42:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604576562; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lC48rY3G8FprNaK8G1jsVkp+PmmXMxlNaUnrRISox9g=; b=SpjPrYPs2rP4OWsjl4sOdVh1rtkzCxMeF6F4D+nIS+r0/ZU+PnAAZ4+CtAe/sO6VBLYT+b O6Xv6XHLgJ7Fbfl7Lsrvwe2rcw35oEOmGUv4tS3AE7eI3zb5sifhKKmVCTwlU1PWnINlyz HkHeuaeI7z5dQqxmj3T6YWJYcz64/cE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-248-dP58eRpwPdmP_gpji0-diA-1; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 06:42:27 -0500 X-MC-Unique: dP58eRpwPdmP_gpji0-diA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64FA57207; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:42:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-114-186.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.186]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BA821E98; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:42:17 +0000 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: VFIO Migration Message-ID: <20201105114217.GD462479@stefanha-x1.localdomain> References: <20201102111153.GC42093@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20201102132844.332f680c.cohuck@redhat.com> <20201102145626.GA186617@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20201104080745.qvpofinyni2wprq2@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20201104164010.GB425016@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20201105064724.qd55txohwbfpvdsg@sirius.home.kraxel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201105064724.qd55txohwbfpvdsg@sirius.home.kraxel.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=stefanha@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T" Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=stefanha@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/04 22:46:30 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: John G Johnson , mtsirkin@redhat.com, Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=2E_Berrang=E9?= , quintela@redhat.com, Jason Wang , Cornelia Huck , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Kirti Wankhede , Thanos Makatos , Alex Williamson , Felipe Franciosi , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 07:47:24AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > > Yes. If you are creating a custom device that no one else needs to > > > > emulate then you can simply pick a unique URL: > > > >=20 > > > > https://vendor.com/my-dev > > > >=20 > > > > There doesn't need to be anything at the URL. It's just a unique st= ring > > > > that no one else will use and therefore web URLs are handy because = no > > > > one else will accidentally pick your string. > > >=20 > > > If this is just a string I think it would be better to use the revers= e > > > domain name scheme (as used by virtio-serial too), i.e. > > >=20 > > > - org.qemu.devices.e1000e > > > - com.vendor.my-dev > >=20 > > This is the Java syntax. >=20 > I think both android and ios use that too, for app naming (but maybe that > comes from java). >=20 > > Go uses gitlab.com/my-user/foo and I think it's > > nicer but I think I'm bikeshedding. > >=20 > > Is there any particular reason why you prefer the reverse domain name > > approach? >=20 > Having "https://" at the start is odd, especially if we don't require > that the given URL returns something useful. Other that that I don't > mind that much whenever we use go-style or java-style strings, with a > slight preference for the latter for consistency with virtio-serial. Thanks for explaining. We can discuss the exact format in the next revision if there are opinions. Stefan --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAl+j5RkACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8gDBQf/f25a5nzNbNrhmTjHjGc4qz0hledCJ3Th3BuQqZHkRypjbNtQmvw3nh5c vkhFI/+80GaIsdXIZENOlgVb9I2reJT1WWujyCa4UnJ0sariGY6ZPqivFTrNSotI cZoXjeN9fxGI00NxQhMPfNmUeTKiKo5BHU0thImwMPGUIwJZPFMHWr0ndA/AnFEt k6E82m+N785mpiQu8wn8dpr9IpiayxxcrGreXHy3dblsVeGBxsMKWmHsUFyf61Iv zc7Lv/e73QokGZwyPooBnWZm0Urkm0tgthIjAGjg9yXKmM76L7OllTGU3WfoBnj6 3J4Z3lbgKsYpNbMTUiEPKzgrz02qzA== =QGC9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5gxpn/Q6ypwruk0T--