* [PATCH] util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci()
@ 2020-11-16 10:59 David Hildenbrand
2020-11-16 13:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-16 18:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2020-11-16 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Pankaj Gupta, Michael S. Tsirkin, David Hildenbrand,
Dr . David Alan Gilbert, Peter Xu, Alex Williamson, Wei Yang,
Igor Mammedov, Paolo Bonzini
Currently, when using "nvme://" for a block device, like
-drive file=nvme://0000:01:00.0/1,if=none,id=drive0 \
-device virtio-blk,drive=drive0 \
VFIO may pin all guest memory, and discarding of RAM no longer works as
expected. I was able to reproduce this easily with my
01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
Similar to common VFIO, we have to disable it, making sure that:
a) virtio-balloon won't discard any memory ("silently disabled")
b) virtio-mem and nvme:// run mutually exclusive
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
stubs/ram-block.c | 6 ++++++
util/vfio-helpers.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/stubs/ram-block.c b/stubs/ram-block.c
index 73c0a3ee08..108197683b 100644
--- a/stubs/ram-block.c
+++ b/stubs/ram-block.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
#include "exec/ramlist.h"
#include "exec/cpu-common.h"
+#include "exec/memory.h"
void *qemu_ram_get_host_addr(RAMBlock *rb)
{
@@ -29,3 +30,8 @@ int qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque)
{
return 0;
}
+
+int ram_block_discard_disable(bool state)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/util/vfio-helpers.c b/util/vfio-helpers.c
index c469beb061..2bec48e163 100644
--- a/util/vfio-helpers.c
+++ b/util/vfio-helpers.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include "qapi/error.h"
#include "exec/ramlist.h"
#include "exec/cpu-common.h"
+#include "exec/memory.h"
#include "trace.h"
#include "qemu/error-report.h"
#include "standard-headers/linux/pci_regs.h"
@@ -494,8 +495,20 @@ QEMUVFIOState *qemu_vfio_open_pci(const char *device, Error **errp)
int r;
QEMUVFIOState *s = g_new0(QEMUVFIOState, 1);
+ /*
+ * VFIO may pin all memory inside mappings, resulting it in pinning
+ * all memory inside RAM blocks unconditionally.
+ */
+ r = ram_block_discard_disable(true);
+ if (r) {
+ error_setg_errno(errp, -r, "Cannot set discarding of RAM broken");
+ g_free(s);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
r = qemu_vfio_init_pci(s, device, errp);
if (r) {
+ ram_block_discard_disable(false);
g_free(s);
return NULL;
}
@@ -837,4 +850,5 @@ void qemu_vfio_close(QEMUVFIOState *s)
close(s->device);
close(s->group);
close(s->container);
+ ram_block_discard_disable(false);
}
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci()
2020-11-16 10:59 [PATCH] util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci() David Hildenbrand
@ 2020-11-16 13:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-16 13:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-11-16 18:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2020-11-16 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, qemu-devel
Cc: Pankaj Gupta, Michael S. Tsirkin, Dr . David Alan Gilbert,
Peter Xu, Eric Auger, Alex Williamson, Wei Yang, Paolo Bonzini,
Igor Mammedov
Hi David,
Is this aiming at 5.2?
On 11/16/20 11:59 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Currently, when using "nvme://" for a block device, like
> -drive file=nvme://0000:01:00.0/1,if=none,id=drive0 \
> -device virtio-blk,drive=drive0 \
>
> VFIO may pin all guest memory, and discarding of RAM no longer works as
> expected. I was able to reproduce this easily with my
> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
> NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
>
> Similar to common VFIO, we have to disable it, making sure that:
> a) virtio-balloon won't discard any memory ("silently disabled")
> b) virtio-mem and nvme:// run mutually exclusive
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> stubs/ram-block.c | 6 ++++++
> util/vfio-helpers.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/stubs/ram-block.c b/stubs/ram-block.c
> index 73c0a3ee08..108197683b 100644
> --- a/stubs/ram-block.c
> +++ b/stubs/ram-block.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> #include "exec/ramlist.h"
> #include "exec/cpu-common.h"
> +#include "exec/memory.h"
>
> void *qemu_ram_get_host_addr(RAMBlock *rb)
> {
> @@ -29,3 +30,8 @@ int qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +int ram_block_discard_disable(bool state)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/util/vfio-helpers.c b/util/vfio-helpers.c
> index c469beb061..2bec48e163 100644
> --- a/util/vfio-helpers.c
> +++ b/util/vfio-helpers.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include "qapi/error.h"
> #include "exec/ramlist.h"
> #include "exec/cpu-common.h"
> +#include "exec/memory.h"
> #include "trace.h"
> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
> #include "standard-headers/linux/pci_regs.h"
> @@ -494,8 +495,20 @@ QEMUVFIOState *qemu_vfio_open_pci(const char *device, Error **errp)
> int r;
> QEMUVFIOState *s = g_new0(QEMUVFIOState, 1);
>
> + /*
> + * VFIO may pin all memory inside mappings, resulting it in pinning
> + * all memory inside RAM blocks unconditionally.
> + */
> + r = ram_block_discard_disable(true);
> + if (r) {
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -r, "Cannot set discarding of RAM broken");
> + g_free(s);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> r = qemu_vfio_init_pci(s, device, errp);
> if (r) {
> + ram_block_discard_disable(false);
> g_free(s);
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -837,4 +850,5 @@ void qemu_vfio_close(QEMUVFIOState *s)
> close(s->device);
> close(s->group);
> close(s->container);
> + ram_block_discard_disable(false);
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci()
2020-11-16 13:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-11-16 13:16 ` David Hildenbrand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2020-11-16 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, qemu-devel
Cc: Pankaj Gupta, Michael S. Tsirkin, Dr . David Alan Gilbert,
Peter Xu, Eric Auger, Alex Williamson, Wei Yang, Paolo Bonzini,
Igor Mammedov
On 16.11.20 14:14, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Is this aiming at 5.2?
Hi,
Good point!
If possible, we want this in 5.2.
Thanks!
>
> On 11/16/20 11:59 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Currently, when using "nvme://" for a block device, like
>> -drive file=nvme://0000:01:00.0/1,if=none,id=drive0 \
>> -device virtio-blk,drive=drive0 \
>>
>> VFIO may pin all guest memory, and discarding of RAM no longer works as
>> expected. I was able to reproduce this easily with my
>> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
>> NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
>>
>> Similar to common VFIO, we have to disable it, making sure that:
>> a) virtio-balloon won't discard any memory ("silently disabled")
>> b) virtio-mem and nvme:// run mutually exclusive
>>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> stubs/ram-block.c | 6 ++++++
>> util/vfio-helpers.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/stubs/ram-block.c b/stubs/ram-block.c
>> index 73c0a3ee08..108197683b 100644
>> --- a/stubs/ram-block.c
>> +++ b/stubs/ram-block.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> #include "exec/ramlist.h"
>> #include "exec/cpu-common.h"
>> +#include "exec/memory.h"
>>
>> void *qemu_ram_get_host_addr(RAMBlock *rb)
>> {
>> @@ -29,3 +30,8 @@ int qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +int ram_block_discard_disable(bool state)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/util/vfio-helpers.c b/util/vfio-helpers.c
>> index c469beb061..2bec48e163 100644
>> --- a/util/vfio-helpers.c
>> +++ b/util/vfio-helpers.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include "qapi/error.h"
>> #include "exec/ramlist.h"
>> #include "exec/cpu-common.h"
>> +#include "exec/memory.h"
>> #include "trace.h"
>> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>> #include "standard-headers/linux/pci_regs.h"
>> @@ -494,8 +495,20 @@ QEMUVFIOState *qemu_vfio_open_pci(const char *device, Error **errp)
>> int r;
>> QEMUVFIOState *s = g_new0(QEMUVFIOState, 1);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * VFIO may pin all memory inside mappings, resulting it in pinning
>> + * all memory inside RAM blocks unconditionally.
>> + */
>> + r = ram_block_discard_disable(true);
>> + if (r) {
>> + error_setg_errno(errp, -r, "Cannot set discarding of RAM broken");
>> + g_free(s);
>> + return NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> r = qemu_vfio_init_pci(s, device, errp);
>> if (r) {
>> + ram_block_discard_disable(false);
>> g_free(s);
>> return NULL;
>> }
>> @@ -837,4 +850,5 @@ void qemu_vfio_close(QEMUVFIOState *s)
>> close(s->device);
>> close(s->group);
>> close(s->container);
>> + ram_block_discard_disable(false);
>> }
>>
>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci()
2020-11-16 10:59 [PATCH] util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci() David Hildenbrand
2020-11-16 13:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2020-11-16 18:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-11-16 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand, qemu-devel
Cc: Pankaj Gupta, Michael S. Tsirkin, Dr . David Alan Gilbert,
Peter Xu, Alex Williamson, Wei Yang, Igor Mammedov
On 16/11/20 11:59, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Currently, when using "nvme://" for a block device, like
> -drive file=nvme://0000:01:00.0/1,if=none,id=drive0 \
> -device virtio-blk,drive=drive0 \
>
> VFIO may pin all guest memory, and discarding of RAM no longer works as
> expected. I was able to reproduce this easily with my
> 01:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
> NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983
>
> Similar to common VFIO, we have to disable it, making sure that:
> a) virtio-balloon won't discard any memory ("silently disabled")
> b) virtio-mem and nvme:// run mutually exclusive
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> stubs/ram-block.c | 6 ++++++
> util/vfio-helpers.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/stubs/ram-block.c b/stubs/ram-block.c
> index 73c0a3ee08..108197683b 100644
> --- a/stubs/ram-block.c
> +++ b/stubs/ram-block.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
> #include "exec/ramlist.h"
> #include "exec/cpu-common.h"
> +#include "exec/memory.h"
>
> void *qemu_ram_get_host_addr(RAMBlock *rb)
> {
> @@ -29,3 +30,8 @@ int qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +int ram_block_discard_disable(bool state)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/util/vfio-helpers.c b/util/vfio-helpers.c
> index c469beb061..2bec48e163 100644
> --- a/util/vfio-helpers.c
> +++ b/util/vfio-helpers.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include "qapi/error.h"
> #include "exec/ramlist.h"
> #include "exec/cpu-common.h"
> +#include "exec/memory.h"
> #include "trace.h"
> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
> #include "standard-headers/linux/pci_regs.h"
> @@ -494,8 +495,20 @@ QEMUVFIOState *qemu_vfio_open_pci(const char *device, Error **errp)
> int r;
> QEMUVFIOState *s = g_new0(QEMUVFIOState, 1);
>
> + /*
> + * VFIO may pin all memory inside mappings, resulting it in pinning
> + * all memory inside RAM blocks unconditionally.
> + */
> + r = ram_block_discard_disable(true);
> + if (r) {
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -r, "Cannot set discarding of RAM broken");
> + g_free(s);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> r = qemu_vfio_init_pci(s, device, errp);
> if (r) {
> + ram_block_discard_disable(false);
> g_free(s);
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -837,4 +850,5 @@ void qemu_vfio_close(QEMUVFIOState *s)
> close(s->device);
> close(s->group);
> close(s->container);
> + ram_block_discard_disable(false);
> }
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-16 18:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-16 10:59 [PATCH] util/vfio-helpers.c: Use ram_block_discard_disable() in qemu_vfio_open_pci() David Hildenbrand
2020-11-16 13:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-16 13:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-11-16 18:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).