From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Rosato" <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Halil Pasic" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-for-5.2] hw/s390x/pci: Fix endianness issue
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:31:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201117143117.4b05db78.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d945234d-4725-9928-11cb-f34606c8524c@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:23:57 +0100
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/20 2:00 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 12:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Fix an endianness issue reported by Cornelia:
> >>
> >>> s390x tcg guest on x86, virtio-pci devices are not detected. The
> >>> relevant feature bits are visible to the guest. Same breakage with
> >>> different guest kernels.
> >>> KVM guests and s390x tcg guests on s390x are fine.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 28dc86a0729 ("s390x/pci: use a PCI Group structure")
> >> Reported-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> RFC because review-only patch, untested
> >> ---
> >> hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
> >> index 58cd041d17f..cfb54b4d8ec 100644
> >> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
> >> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
> >> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ int clp_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r2, uintptr_t ra)
> >> ClpReqQueryPciGrp *reqgrp = (ClpReqQueryPciGrp *)reqh;
> >> S390PCIGroup *group;
> >>
> >> - group = s390_group_find(reqgrp->g);
> >> + group = s390_group_find(ldl_p(&reqgrp->g));
> >
> > 'g' in the ClpReqQueryPciGrp struct is a uint32_t, so
> > adding the ldl_p() will have no effect unless (a) the
> > structure is not 4-aligned and (b) the host will fault on
> > unaligned accesses, which isn't the case for x86 hosts.
> >
> > Q: is this struct really in host order, or should we
> > be using ldl_le_p() or ldl_be_p() and friends here and
> > elsewhere?
> >
> > thanks
> > -- PMM
> >
>
> Hi, I think we better modify the structure here, g should be a byte.
>
> Connie, can you please try this if it resolves the issue?
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
> index fa3bf8b5aa..641d19c815 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h
> @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ typedef struct ClpReqQueryPciGrp {
> uint32_t fmt;
> uint64_t reserved1;
> #define CLP_REQ_QPCIG_MASK_PFGID 0xff
> - uint32_t g;
> + uint32_t g0 :24;
> + uint32_t g :8;
> uint32_t reserved2;
> uint64_t reserved3;
> } QEMU_PACKED ClpReqQueryPciGrp;
>
No, same crash... I fear there are more things broken wrt endianness.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-17 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 12:01 [RFC PATCH-for-5.2] hw/s390x/pci: Fix endianness issue Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-17 12:54 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-17 13:00 ` Peter Maydell
2020-11-17 13:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-17 13:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-17 13:23 ` Pierre Morel
2020-11-17 13:31 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-11-17 14:02 ` Matthew Rosato
2020-11-17 14:13 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-17 14:34 ` Matthew Rosato
2020-11-17 15:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-17 16:01 ` Matthew Rosato
2020-11-17 16:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-17 18:28 ` Thomas Huth
2020-11-17 13:36 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201117143117.4b05db78.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).