From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Andrey Gruzdev <andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Den Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] introduce simple linear scan rate limiting mechanism
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:02:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201119200250.GH6538@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119125940.20017-8-andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:59:40PM +0300, Andrey Gruzdev wrote:
> Since reading UFFD events and saving paged data are performed
> from the same thread, write fault latencies are sensitive to
> migration stream stalls. Limiting total page saving rate is a
> method to reduce amount of noticiable fault resolution latencies.
>
> Migration bandwidth limiting is achieved via noticing cases of
> out-of-threshold write fault latencies and temporarily disabling
> (strictly speaking, severely throttling) saving non-faulting pages.
Just curious: have you measured aver/max latency of wr-protected page requests,
or better, even its distribution?
I believe it should also be relevant to where the snapshot is stored, say, the
backend disk of your tests. Is that a file on some fs?
I would expect the latency should be still good if e.g. the throughput of the
backend file system is decent even without a patch like this, but I might have
missed something..
In all cases, it would be very nice if this patch can have the histogram or
aver or max latency measured and compared before/after this patch applied.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-19 12:59 [PATCH v3 0/7] UFFD write-tracking migration/snapshots Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-11-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] introduce 'track-writes-ram' migration capability Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-11-19 18:51 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-19 19:07 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-20 11:35 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-24 16:55 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-11-24 17:25 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-20 11:32 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] introduce UFFD-WP low-level interface helpers Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-11-19 18:39 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-20 11:04 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-20 15:01 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-20 15:43 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-24 17:57 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-11-25 8:11 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-25 18:43 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-11-25 19:17 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] support UFFD write fault processing in ram_save_iterate() Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-11-19 18:25 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-20 10:44 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-20 15:07 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-20 16:15 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-20 16:43 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-20 16:53 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-23 21:34 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-24 8:02 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-24 15:17 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-24 17:40 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-25 13:08 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-11-25 14:40 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-25 18:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-11-25 19:12 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] implementation of write-tracking migration thread Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-11-19 18:47 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-20 11:41 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] implementation of vm_start() BH Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-11-19 18:46 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-20 11:13 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] the rest of write tracking migration code Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-11-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] introduce simple linear scan rate limiting mechanism Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-11-19 20:02 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2020-11-20 12:06 ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-11-20 15:23 ` Peter Xu
2020-11-24 16:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] UFFD write-tracking migration/snapshots Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201119200250.GH6538@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).