From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCE5C63697 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B57C206CA for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:29:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4B57C206CA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51388 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFSe-0001oj-8V for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:29:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFNI-0004V0-Bj; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:44 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:2157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiFND-0003rA-2z; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:23:44 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Chb3L5nMJz73Mk; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.27) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:23:24 +0800 From: Alex Chen To: , , Subject: [PATCH 2/5] i.MX31: Fix bad printf format specifiers Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:11:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20201126111109.112238-3-alex.chen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> References: <20201126111109.112238-1-alex.chen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.27] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.35; envelope-from=alex.chen@huawei.com; helo=szxga07-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alex.chen@huawei.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We should use printf format specifier "%u" instead of "%d" for argument of type "unsigned int". Reported-by: Euler Robot Signed-off-by: Alex Chen --- hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c | 14 +++++++------- hw/misc/imx_ccm.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c b/hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c index 6e246827ab..ad30a4b2c0 100644 --- a/hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c +++ b/hw/misc/imx31_ccm.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static const char *imx31_ccm_reg_name(uint32_t reg) case IMX31_CCM_PDR2_REG: return "PDR2"; default: - sprintf(unknown, "[%d ?]", reg); + sprintf(unknown, "[%u ?]", reg); return unknown; } } @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_pll_ref_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = CKIH_FREQ; } - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_mpll_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx_ccm_calc_pll(s->reg[IMX31_CCM_MPCTL_REG], imx31_ccm_get_pll_ref_clk(dev)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_mcu_main_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx31_ccm_get_mpll_clk(dev); } - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_hclk_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx31_ccm_get_mcu_main_clk(dev) / (1 + EXTRACT(s->reg[IMX31_CCM_PDR0_REG], MAX)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_ipg_clk(IMXCCMState *dev) freq = imx31_ccm_get_hclk_clk(dev) / (1 + EXTRACT(s->reg[IMX31_CCM_PDR0_REG], IPG)); - DPRINTF("freq = %d\n", freq); + DPRINTF("freq = %u\n", freq); return freq; } @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static uint32_t imx31_ccm_get_clock_frequency(IMXCCMState *dev, IMXClk clock) break; } - DPRINTF("Clock = %d) = %d\n", clock, freq); + DPRINTF("Clock = %d) = %u\n", clock, freq); return freq; } diff --git a/hw/misc/imx_ccm.c b/hw/misc/imx_ccm.c index 52882071d3..08a50ee4c8 100644 --- a/hw/misc/imx_ccm.c +++ b/hw/misc/imx_ccm.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ uint32_t imx_ccm_get_clock_frequency(IMXCCMState *dev, IMXClk clock) freq = klass->get_clock_frequency(dev, clock); } - DPRINTF("(clock = %d) = %d\n", clock, freq); + DPRINTF("(clock = %d) = %u\n", clock, freq); return freq; } @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ uint32_t imx_ccm_calc_pll(uint32_t pllreg, uint32_t base_freq) freq = ((2 * (base_freq >> 10) * (mfi * mfd + mfn)) / (mfd * pd)) << 10; - DPRINTF("(pllreg = 0x%08x, base_freq = %d) = %d\n", pllreg, base_freq, + DPRINTF("(pllreg = 0x%08x, base_freq = %u) = %d\n", pllreg, base_freq, freq); return freq; -- 2.19.1