From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F8AC63697 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E44CD2053B for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="ZOuAOYME" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E44CD2053B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=nongnu.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:58004 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiLNv-0006Zm-9W for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:48:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiLED-0005UZ-0L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:38:45 -0500 Received: from esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com ([216.71.155.144]:8072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kiLE5-0006wh-Cw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 12:38:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1606412317; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=bXQzNtHqJ2Yw8039qwF6PExFC7hXWX7QRQoV51ZIeHI=; b=ZOuAOYMEpgRhmz6PKBEzsD/O1xtj3V7MN/LMzgmT4F8WWPW0aPYLUd93 l0BUnV6rI2LOxIPe+Tq8W7yfRs4hfBSOaSmICvjkYYEWZXt8WLApELr+y r+GbZ5NFYzc8WakCHUR5oKTAL7XwgMuzoDjk/JOQLzf4CBTN5O+YXoj+d w=; Authentication-Results: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: KFVGLLdvf8DEeihaDbUXddHR0GUT3gEY/wdoGM652HXR/2rCOBM0eF25OhgsWDNyfp9MYeek/X 0WqeC80WMCfN5zCQyhxAe/ClDmUBJc/JGrvvkpaaf8+FQl/NGDNBjFJ7foXBTOmAsMLwcty1Gm HyVsqyBsVA4G3HPVyHI1XZR324jHdTkA8nGTMYXZrCt7x0UIlPuH696eY5fnGbQaPvhMOZ9Aoo M8iqvI23iZcXGqxutTGvgaJUYGdwZdT71+kxty6g9x2cBmotdnH2k6/JUn+s7MnnpHKhmbihk2 YHU= X-SBRS: None X-MesageID: 33168172 X-Ironport-Server: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,372,1599537600"; d="scan'208";a="33168172" Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:38:24 +0000 To: Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= CC: , Jiaxun Yang , "Igor Mammedov" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Paolo Bonzini" , Marcel Apfelbaum , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Aurelien Jarno , Thomas Huth , Eduardo Habkost , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Aleksandar Rikalo , Richard Henderson , Fam Zheng , "Daniel P . Berrange" , Stefano Stabellini , Paul Durrant , Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-6.0 v4 15/17] gitlab-ci: Add test for Xen (on CentOS 7) Message-ID: <20201126173824.GB2098@perard.uk.xensource.com> References: <20201108204535.2319870-1-philmd@redhat.com> <20201108204535.2319870-16-philmd@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20201108204535.2319870-16-philmd@redhat.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.71.155.144; envelope-from=anthony.perard@citrix.com; helo=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Reply-to: Anthony PERARD From: Anthony PERARD via On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:45:33PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Xen packages are available in CentOS 7, but have been > removed from CentOS 8. Use the CentOS 7 container. Technically Xen has never been in CentOS 8, I'm working on it, slowly. > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > --- > Cc: Eduardo Habkost > Cc: Stefano Stabellini > Cc: Anthony Perard > Cc: Paul Durrant > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > --- > .gitlab-ci.yml | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml > index 2f0da7b3dc1..8e15266c277 100644 > --- a/.gitlab-ci.yml > +++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml > @@ -557,6 +557,27 @@ check-crypto-only-gnutls: > IMAGE: centos7 > MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check > > +build-xen-centos: > + <<: *native_build_job_definition > + variables: > + IMAGE: centos7 > + TARGETS: i386-softmmu x86_64-softmmu > + CONFIGURE_ARGS: --enable-xen > + MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check-build > + artifacts: > + paths: > + - build > + > +check-xen-centos: > + <<: *native_test_job_definition > + needs: > + - job: build-xen-centos > + artifacts: true > + variables: > + IMAGE: centos7 > + MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check Is `make check` going to do something useful with the Xen support? Or is it going to need more work in order to test the Xen support of QEMU? (Like starting an actual Xen guest.) Cheers, -- Anthony PERARD