From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: virt-ci-maint-team@redhat.com,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Willian Rampazzo" <wrampazz@redhat.com>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-for-5.2] gitlab-ci: Do not automatically run Avocado integration tests anymore
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 10:31:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130103109.GD2039965@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9157dce0-4f5d-3f1e-ce75-3e9da9252203@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 07:29:31PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 27/11/2020 18.57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 11/27/20 6:47 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> On 27/11/2020 18.41, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>> We lately realized that the Avocado framework was not designed
> >>> to be regularly run on CI environments. Therefore, as of 5.2
> >>> we deprecate the gitlab-ci jobs using Avocado. To not disrupt
> >>> current users, it is possible to keep the current behavior by
> >>> setting the QEMU_CI_INTEGRATION_JOBS_PRE_5_2_RELEASE variable
> >>> (see [*]).
> >>> From now on, using these jobs (or adding new tests to them)
> >>> is strongly discouraged.
> >>>
> >>> Tests based on Avocado will be ported to new job schemes during
> >>> the next releases, with better documentation and templates.
> >>
> >> Why should we disable the jobs by default as long as there is no replacement
> >> available yet?
> >
> > Why keep it enabled if it is failing randomly
>
> We can still disable single jobs if they are not stable, but that's no
> reason to disable all of them by default, is it?
Agreed, the jobs which are known to be broken or unreliable should
be unconditonally disabled in QEMU as a whole. This isn't specific
to gitlab config - the qemu build makefiles/mesonfiles should disable
the problem tests entirely, as we don't want developers wasting time
running them locally either if they're known to be broken/unreliable.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-27 17:41 [RFC PATCH-for-5.2] gitlab-ci: Do not automatically run Avocado integration tests anymore Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-27 17:47 ` Thomas Huth
2020-11-27 17:57 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-27 18:29 ` Thomas Huth
2020-11-27 18:46 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-30 8:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-30 9:36 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-30 10:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-30 9:03 ` Thomas Huth
2020-11-30 9:52 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-30 10:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-11-30 10:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2020-11-30 16:45 ` Ademar Reis
2020-12-04 14:42 ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2020-11-27 23:21 ` Niek Linnenbank
2020-11-27 19:36 ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2020-11-30 21:42 ` Willian Rampazzo
2020-12-01 3:48 ` Cleber Rosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130103109.GD2039965@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=virt-ci-maint-team@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
--cc=wrampazz@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).