Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] security-process: update process information

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:32:44AM +0530, P J P wrote:
> +-- On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote --+
> | > +    - If issue is found to be less severe, an upstream public bug (or an
> | > +      issue) will be created immediately.
> | 
> | No need to repeat "or an issue". I think it would read more clearly as
> | 
> |    - If the severity of the issue is sufficiently low, an upstream public bug
> |      may be created immediately.
> 
> * Let's settle on public GitLab issues, shall we? 
> 
> * Tomorrow after an issue triage if someone asks where should they create a 
>   public tracker, it's better to have one definite answer, instead of choose 
>   either LaunchPad or GitLab issues.
> 
> * OR is it better to have both? ie. file a public tracker anywhere as per ones 
>   convenience?
> 
> * One GitLab is good I think.

Just link to the page where QEMU documents its bug tracker. That is
current laucnhpad, but may change to Gitlab. The security docs don't
need to mention the specific host, if we just link to the bugs page.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|