qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	"Willian Rampazzo" <wrampazz@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/acceptance: fix timeout for vm.wait
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:56:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201203165629.GC2787993@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32d30a1d-51a5-b04e-19cb-e33e90b2d659@ispras.ru>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2394 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 09:29:10AM +0300, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> On 02.12.2020 18:22, John Snow wrote:
> > On 12/2/20 1:31 AM, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This patch adds timeout parameter to vm.wait() calls,
> > > > > > because the default
> > > > > > value is just 30 seconds, and tests may last for more time.
> > > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > This doesn't sound right -- the timeout isn't meant to be for
> > > > the entire duration of the test, the timeout is from the time of
> > > > issuing a shutdown command until the time the VM actually shuts
> > > > down. Ideally, that should not take a particularly long time in
> > > > a well-behaved test.
> > > > 
> > > > Why is it lasting longer than 30 seconds?
> > > 
> > > These are complex Linux boot&execution tests.
> > > Such loading process could take more than 30 seconds.
> > > E.g., BootLinux tests have timeout of 900 seconds.
> > 
> > This timeout should only count towards the time spent *shutting down*,
> > not the time to run the entire test. 30 seconds used to be enough time
> > for this to happen on gitlab, if it's taking longer than that I am
> > worried that something has gone wrong.
> > 
> > Where were the failures observed, and on what tests? Are there logs I
> > can review?
> 
> I've got your point. You were right.
> The problem was with new long-lasting record/replay tests:
>

Hi Pavel,

You mean a new test you're writing based on "boot_linux.py"?

> if record:
>     cloudinit.wait_for_phone_home(('0.0.0.0', self.phone_home_port),
>                                   self.name)
>     vm.shutdown()
>     logger.info('finished the recording with log size %s bytes'
>                 % os.path.getsize(replay_path))
> else:
>     vm.wait(None)
>     logger.info('successfully fihished the replay')
> 
> 
> Replay phase here waits for shutdown for the whole period of Linux boot and
> execution. We don't check any VM output and just wait for finishing
> the replay.
>

I'm missing why a replay be different when it comes to waiting for a
successfull "I'm finished booting" from the guest?  Wouldn't the guest
during the replay act just the same?

> Smaller RR tests include "self.wait_for_console_pattern" during replay and
> therefore can't have problems with this timeout.
>
> Pavel Dovgalyuk
> 

Right.

Thanks,
- Cleber.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-03 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-16 10:08 [PATCH] tests/acceptance: fix timeout for vm.wait Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-11-16 11:13 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-12-01 19:15   ` John Snow
2020-12-02  6:31     ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-12-02 15:22       ` John Snow
2020-12-03  6:29         ` Pavel Dovgalyuk
2020-12-03 16:56           ` Cleber Rosa [this message]
2020-12-04  6:38             ` Pavel Dovgalyuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201203165629.GC2787993@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=wrampazz@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).