qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Andrey Gruzdev <andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Den Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] migration: support UFFD write fault processing in ram_save_iterate()
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:09:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201208180919.GC21402@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201204093103.9878-4-andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com>

On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:31:02PM +0300, Andrey Gruzdev wrote:
> In this particular implementation the same single migration
> thread is responsible for both normal linear dirty page
> migration and procesing UFFD page fault events.
> 
> Processing write faults includes reading UFFD file descriptor,
> finding respective RAM block and saving faulting page to
> the migration stream. After page has been saved, write protection
> can be removed. Since asynchronous version of qemu_put_buffer()
> is expected to be used to save pages, we also have to flush
> migraion stream prior to un-protecting saved memory range.
> 
> Write protection is being removed for any previously protected
> memory chunk that has hit the migration stream. That's valid
> for pages from linear page scan along with write fault pages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Gruzdev <andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com>

I still think the ram_save_host_page_pre/post are a bit odd; but I think it's
good enough (at least Dave/Juan didn't complain yet, so I guess it's ok).

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-08 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-04  9:30 [PATCH v5 0/4] migration: UFFD write-tracking migration/snapshots Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-12-04  9:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] migration: introduce 'background-snapshot' migration capability Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-12-08 15:47   ` Peter Xu
2020-12-09  7:08     ` Andrey Gruzdev
2020-12-04  9:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] migration: introduce UFFD-WP low-level interface helpers Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-12-08 17:57   ` Peter Xu
2020-12-04  9:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] migration: support UFFD write fault processing in ram_save_iterate() Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-12-08 18:09   ` Peter Xu [this message]
2020-12-04  9:31 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] migration: implementation of background snapshot thread Andrey Gruzdev via
2020-12-08 18:16   ` Peter Xu
2020-12-08 18:24 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] migration: UFFD write-tracking migration/snapshots Peter Xu
2020-12-09  7:17   ` Andrey Gruzdev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201208180919.GC21402@xz-x1 \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrey.gruzdev@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).