From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: zhukeqian <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
Cc: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Take into account the unaligned section size when preparing bitmap
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 09:50:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201210145006.GD3211@xz-x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d46e5ca-24ab-7c44-201c-77e8fc6a2ace@huawei.com>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:53:23AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/12/10 10:08, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Keqian,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 09:46:06AM +0800, zhukeqian wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I see that if start or size is not PAGE aligned, it also clears areas
> >> which beyond caller's expectation, so do we also need to consider this?
> >
> > Could you elaborate?
> >
> > If start_delta != 0, kvm_log_clear_one_slot() should already go the slow path.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> start_delta /= psize;
>
> If start is not PAGE aligned, then start_delta is not PAGE aligned.
> so I think the above code will implicitly extend our start to be PAGE aligned.
>
> I suggest that we should shrink the start and (start + size) to be PAGE aligned
> at beginning of this function.
Callers should be with TARGET_PAGE_SIZE aligned on the size, so at least x86_64
should be pretty safe since host/guest page sizes match.
Though indeed I must confess I don't know how it worked in general when host
page size != target page size, at least for migration. For example, I believe
kvm dirty logging is host page size based, though migration should be migrating
pages in guest page size granule when it spots a dirty bit set.
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-08 11:40 [PATCH] kvm: Take into account the unaligned section size when preparing bitmap Zenghui Yu
2020-12-08 15:16 ` Peter Xu
2020-12-09 2:33 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-12-09 21:09 ` Peter Xu
2020-12-10 4:23 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-12-10 1:46 ` zhukeqian
2020-12-10 2:08 ` Peter Xu
2020-12-10 2:53 ` zhukeqian
2020-12-10 3:31 ` Zenghui Yu
2020-12-10 14:50 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2020-12-11 1:13 ` zhukeqian
2020-12-11 15:25 ` Peter Xu
2020-12-14 2:14 ` zhukeqian
2020-12-14 15:36 ` Peter Xu
2020-12-15 7:23 ` zhukeqian
2020-12-15 7:39 ` Zenghui Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201210145006.GD3211@xz-x1 \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).