* [PATCH v4 1/3] target/arm: Implement an IMPDEF pauth algorithm
2020-12-16 22:12 [PATCH v4 0/3] target/arm: Implement an IMPDEF pauth algorithm Richard Henderson
@ 2020-12-16 22:12 ` Richard Henderson
2021-01-08 14:15 ` Peter Maydell
2020-12-16 22:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] target/arm: Add cpu properties to control pauth Richard Henderson
2020-12-16 22:12 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] target/arm: Use object_property_add_bool for "sve" property Richard Henderson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2020-12-16 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Mark Rutland, peter.maydell, qemu-arm
Without hardware acceleration, a cryptographically strong
algorithm is too expensive for pauth_computepac.
Even with hardware accel, we are not currently expecting
to link the linux-user binaries to any crypto libraries,
and doing so would generally make the --static build fail.
So choose XXH64 as a reasonably quick and decent hash.
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v2: Move the XXH64 bits to xxhash.h (ajb).
Create isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch and fixup a comment
in isar_feature_aa64_pauth that no longer applies.
---
include/qemu/xxhash.h | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target/arm/cpu.h | 15 +++++--
target/arm/pauth_helper.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/qemu/xxhash.h b/include/qemu/xxhash.h
index 076f1f6054..cf45859a19 100644
--- a/include/qemu/xxhash.h
+++ b/include/qemu/xxhash.h
@@ -119,4 +119,86 @@ static inline uint32_t qemu_xxhash6(uint64_t ab, uint64_t cd, uint32_t e,
return qemu_xxhash7(ab, cd, e, f, 0);
}
+/*
+ * Component parts of the XXH64 algorithm from
+ * https://github.com/Cyan4973/xxHash/blob/v0.8.0/xxhash.h
+ *
+ * The complete algorithm looks like
+ *
+ * i = 0;
+ * if (len >= 32) {
+ * v1 = seed + XXH_PRIME64_1 + XXH_PRIME64_2;
+ * v2 = seed + XXH_PRIME64_2;
+ * v3 = seed + 0;
+ * v4 = seed - XXH_PRIME64_1;
+ * do {
+ * v1 = XXH64_round(v1, get64bits(input + i));
+ * v2 = XXH64_round(v2, get64bits(input + i + 8));
+ * v3 = XXH64_round(v3, get64bits(input + i + 16));
+ * v4 = XXH64_round(v4, get64bits(input + i + 24));
+ * } while ((i += 32) <= len);
+ * h64 = XXH64_mergerounds(v1, v2, v3, v4);
+ * } else {
+ * h64 = seed + XXH_PRIME64_5;
+ * }
+ * h64 += len;
+ *
+ * for (; i + 8 <= len; i += 8) {
+ * h64 ^= XXH64_round(0, get64bits(input + i));
+ * h64 = rol64(h64, 27) * XXH_PRIME64_1 + XXH_PRIME64_4;
+ * }
+ * for (; i + 4 <= len; i += 4) {
+ * h64 ^= get32bits(input + i) * PRIME64_1;
+ * h64 = rol64(h64, 23) * XXH_PRIME64_2 + XXH_PRIME64_3;
+ * }
+ * for (; i < len; i += 1) {
+ * h64 ^= get8bits(input + i) * XXH_PRIME64_5;
+ * h64 = rol64(h64, 11) * XXH_PRIME64_1;
+ * }
+ *
+ * return XXH64_avalanche(h64)
+ *
+ * Exposing the pieces instead allows for simplified usage when
+ * the length is a known constant and the inputs are in registers.
+ */
+#define XXH_PRIME64_1 0x9E3779B185EBCA87ULL
+#define XXH_PRIME64_2 0xC2B2AE3D27D4EB4FULL
+#define XXH_PRIME64_3 0x165667B19E3779F9ULL
+#define XXH_PRIME64_4 0x85EBCA77C2B2AE63ULL
+#define XXH_PRIME64_5 0x27D4EB2F165667C5ULL
+
+static inline uint64_t XXH64_round(uint64_t acc, uint64_t input)
+{
+ return rol64(acc + input * XXH_PRIME64_2, 31) * XXH_PRIME64_1;
+}
+
+static inline uint64_t XXH64_mergeround(uint64_t acc, uint64_t val)
+{
+ return (acc ^ XXH64_round(0, val)) * XXH_PRIME64_1 + XXH_PRIME64_4;
+}
+
+static inline uint64_t XXH64_mergerounds(uint64_t v1, uint64_t v2,
+ uint64_t v3, uint64_t v4)
+{
+ uint64_t h64;
+
+ h64 = rol64(v1, 1) + rol64(v2, 7) + rol64(v3, 12) + rol64(v4, 18);
+ h64 = XXH64_mergeround(h64, v1);
+ h64 = XXH64_mergeround(h64, v2);
+ h64 = XXH64_mergeround(h64, v3);
+ h64 = XXH64_mergeround(h64, v4);
+
+ return h64;
+}
+
+static inline uint64_t XXH64_avalanche(uint64_t h64)
+{
+ h64 ^= h64 >> 33;
+ h64 *= XXH_PRIME64_2;
+ h64 ^= h64 >> 29;
+ h64 *= XXH_PRIME64_3;
+ h64 ^= h64 >> 32;
+ return h64;
+}
+
#endif /* QEMU_XXHASH_H */
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 7e6c881a7e..70e9618d13 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -3852,10 +3852,8 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_fcma(const ARMISARegisters *id)
static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth(const ARMISARegisters *id)
{
/*
- * Note that while QEMU will only implement the architected algorithm
- * QARMA, and thus APA+GPA, the host cpu for kvm may use implementation
- * defined algorithms, and thus API+GPI, and this predicate controls
- * migration of the 128-bit keys.
+ * Return true if any form of pauth is enabled, as this
+ * predicate controls migration of the 128-bit keys.
*/
return (id->id_aa64isar1 &
(FIELD_DP64(0, ID_AA64ISAR1, APA, 0xf) |
@@ -3864,6 +3862,15 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth(const ARMISARegisters *id)
FIELD_DP64(0, ID_AA64ISAR1, GPI, 0xf))) != 0;
}
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+ /*
+ * Return true if pauth is enabled with the architected QARMA algorithm.
+ * QEMU will always set APA+GPA to the same value.
+ */
+ return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64isar1, ID_AA64ISAR1, APA) != 0;
+}
+
static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_sb(const ARMISARegisters *id)
{
return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64isar1, ID_AA64ISAR1, SB) != 0;
diff --git a/target/arm/pauth_helper.c b/target/arm/pauth_helper.c
index 564c48faa6..226bcf6c45 100644
--- a/target/arm/pauth_helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/pauth_helper.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include "exec/cpu_ldst.h"
#include "exec/helper-proto.h"
#include "tcg/tcg-gvec-desc.h"
+#include "qemu/xxhash.h"
static uint64_t pac_cell_shuffle(uint64_t i)
@@ -207,8 +208,8 @@ static uint64_t tweak_inv_shuffle(uint64_t i)
return o;
}
-static uint64_t pauth_computepac(uint64_t data, uint64_t modifier,
- ARMPACKey key)
+static uint64_t pauth_computepac_architected(uint64_t data, uint64_t modifier,
+ ARMPACKey key)
{
static const uint64_t RC[5] = {
0x0000000000000000ull,
@@ -272,6 +273,36 @@ static uint64_t pauth_computepac(uint64_t data, uint64_t modifier,
return workingval;
}
+static uint64_t pauth_computepac_impdef(uint64_t data, uint64_t modifier,
+ ARMPACKey key)
+{
+ /*
+ * The XXH64 algorithmm, simplified for size 32.
+ * See the description of the algorithm in xxhash.h.
+ */
+ uint64_t v1 = QEMU_XXHASH_SEED + XXH_PRIME64_1 + XXH_PRIME64_2;
+ uint64_t v2 = QEMU_XXHASH_SEED + XXH_PRIME64_2;
+ uint64_t v3 = QEMU_XXHASH_SEED + 0;
+ uint64_t v4 = QEMU_XXHASH_SEED - XXH_PRIME64_1;
+
+ v1 = XXH64_round(v1, data);
+ v2 = XXH64_round(v2, modifier);
+ v3 = XXH64_round(v3, key.lo);
+ v4 = XXH64_round(v4, key.hi);
+
+ return XXH64_avalanche(XXH64_mergerounds(v1, v2, v3, v4));
+}
+
+static uint64_t pauth_computepac(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t data,
+ uint64_t modifier, ARMPACKey key)
+{
+ if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_pauth_arch, env_archcpu(env))) {
+ return pauth_computepac_architected(data, modifier, key);
+ } else {
+ return pauth_computepac_impdef(data, modifier, key);
+ }
+}
+
static uint64_t pauth_addpac(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t ptr, uint64_t modifier,
ARMPACKey *key, bool data)
{
@@ -292,7 +323,7 @@ static uint64_t pauth_addpac(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t ptr, uint64_t modifier,
bot_bit = 64 - param.tsz;
ext_ptr = deposit64(ptr, bot_bit, top_bit - bot_bit, ext);
- pac = pauth_computepac(ext_ptr, modifier, *key);
+ pac = pauth_computepac(env, ext_ptr, modifier, *key);
/*
* Check if the ptr has good extension bits and corrupt the
@@ -341,7 +372,7 @@ static uint64_t pauth_auth(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t ptr, uint64_t modifier,
uint64_t pac, orig_ptr, test;
orig_ptr = pauth_original_ptr(ptr, param);
- pac = pauth_computepac(orig_ptr, modifier, *key);
+ pac = pauth_computepac(env, orig_ptr, modifier, *key);
bot_bit = 64 - param.tsz;
top_bit = 64 - 8 * param.tbi;
@@ -442,7 +473,7 @@ uint64_t HELPER(pacga)(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t x, uint64_t y)
uint64_t pac;
pauth_check_trap(env, arm_current_el(env), GETPC());
- pac = pauth_computepac(x, y, env->keys.apga);
+ pac = pauth_computepac(env, x, y, env->keys.apga);
return pac & 0xffffffff00000000ull;
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] target/arm: Implement an IMPDEF pauth algorithm
2020-12-16 22:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Richard Henderson
@ 2021-01-08 14:15 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2021-01-08 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: Mark Rutland, qemu-arm, QEMU Developers
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 22:12, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Without hardware acceleration, a cryptographically strong
> algorithm is too expensive for pauth_computepac.
>
> Even with hardware accel, we are not currently expecting
> to link the linux-user binaries to any crypto libraries,
> and doing so would generally make the --static build fail.
>
> So choose XXH64 as a reasonably quick and decent hash.
>
> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2: Move the XXH64 bits to xxhash.h (ajb).
> Create isar_feature_aa64_pauth_arch and fixup a comment
> in isar_feature_aa64_pauth that no longer applies.
> ---
> +static uint64_t pauth_computepac_impdef(uint64_t data, uint64_t modifier,
> + ARMPACKey key)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The XXH64 algorithmm, simplified for size 32.
> + * See the description of the algorithm in xxhash.h.
> + */
> + uint64_t v1 = QEMU_XXHASH_SEED + XXH_PRIME64_1 + XXH_PRIME64_2;
> + uint64_t v2 = QEMU_XXHASH_SEED + XXH_PRIME64_2;
> + uint64_t v3 = QEMU_XXHASH_SEED + 0;
> + uint64_t v4 = QEMU_XXHASH_SEED - XXH_PRIME64_1;
> +
> + v1 = XXH64_round(v1, data);
> + v2 = XXH64_round(v2, modifier);
> + v3 = XXH64_round(v3, key.lo);
> + v4 = XXH64_round(v4, key.hi);
> +
> + return XXH64_avalanche(XXH64_mergerounds(v1, v2, v3, v4));
Since the only use of xxh64 we make is "feed in 4 64 bit inputs
and get a 64 bit result", why provide all the components and
stitch them together here rather than following the existing
pattern we have for qemu_xxhash* (the xxh32 algorithm) and
providing a function
static inline uint64_t qemu_xxhash64_4(uint64_t a, uint64_t b,
uint64_t c, uint64_t d)
in xxhash.h ?
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/3] target/arm: Add cpu properties to control pauth
2020-12-16 22:12 [PATCH v4 0/3] target/arm: Implement an IMPDEF pauth algorithm Richard Henderson
2020-12-16 22:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Richard Henderson
@ 2020-12-16 22:12 ` Richard Henderson
2021-01-08 14:16 ` Peter Maydell
2020-12-16 22:12 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] target/arm: Use object_property_add_bool for "sve" property Richard Henderson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2020-12-16 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Mark Rutland, peter.maydell, Andrew Jones, qemu-arm
The crypto overhead of emulating pauth can be significant for
some workloads. Add two boolean properties that allows the
feature to be turned off, on with the architected algorithm,
or on with an implementation defined algorithm.
We need two intermediate booleans to control the state while
parsing properties lest we clobber ID_AA64ISAR1 into an invalid
intermediate state.
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v2: Use boolean properties instead of an enum (drjones).
v3: Add tests (drjones).
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 10 +++++++++
target/arm/cpu.c | 13 +++++++++++
target/arm/cpu64.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
target/arm/monitor.c | 3 ++-
tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 13 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 70e9618d13..06f5169f45 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -197,9 +197,11 @@ typedef struct {
#ifdef TARGET_AARCH64
# define ARM_MAX_VQ 16
void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
+void arm_cpu_pauth_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
#else
# define ARM_MAX_VQ 1
static inline void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp) { }
+static inline void arm_cpu_pauth_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp) { }
#endif
typedef struct ARMVectorReg {
@@ -947,6 +949,14 @@ struct ARMCPU {
uint64_t reset_cbar;
uint32_t reset_auxcr;
bool reset_hivecs;
+
+ /*
+ * Intermediate values used during property parsing.
+ * Once finalized, the values should be read from ID_AA64ISAR1.
+ */
+ bool prop_pauth;
+ bool prop_pauth_impdef;
+
/* DCZ blocksize, in log_2(words), ie low 4 bits of DCZID_EL0 */
uint32_t dcz_blocksize;
uint64_t rvbar;
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index d6188f6566..5c5fb16114 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -1321,6 +1321,19 @@ void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
+
+ /*
+ * KVM does not support modifications to this feature.
+ * We have not registered the cpu properties when KVM
+ * is in use, so the user will not be able to set them.
+ */
+ if (!kvm_enabled()) {
+ arm_cpu_pauth_finalize(cpu, &local_err);
+ if (local_err != NULL) {
+ error_propagate(errp, local_err);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
}
if (kvm_enabled()) {
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index 7cf9fc4bc6..d9feaa9cdb 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
#include "kvm_arm.h"
#include "qapi/visitor.h"
+#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
+
#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
static uint64_t a57_a53_l2ctlr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
@@ -572,6 +574,36 @@ void aarch64_add_sve_properties(Object *obj)
}
}
+void arm_cpu_pauth_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
+{
+ int arch_val = 0, impdef_val = 0;
+ uint64_t t;
+
+ /* TODO: Handle HaveEnhancedPAC, HaveEnhancedPAC2, HaveFPAC. */
+ if (cpu->prop_pauth) {
+ if (cpu->prop_pauth_impdef) {
+ impdef_val = 1;
+ } else {
+ arch_val = 1;
+ }
+ } else if (cpu->prop_pauth_impdef) {
+ error_setg(errp, "cannot enable pauth-impdef without pauth");
+ error_append_hint(errp, "Add pauth=on to the CPU property list.\n");
+ }
+
+ t = cpu->isar.id_aa64isar1;
+ t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, APA, arch_val);
+ t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, GPA, arch_val);
+ t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, API, impdef_val);
+ t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, GPI, impdef_val);
+ cpu->isar.id_aa64isar1 = t;
+}
+
+static Property arm_cpu_pauth_property =
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("pauth", ARMCPU, prop_pauth, true);
+static Property arm_cpu_pauth_impdef_property =
+ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("pauth-impdef", ARMCPU, prop_pauth_impdef, false);
+
/* -cpu max: if KVM is enabled, like -cpu host (best possible with this host);
* otherwise, a CPU with as many features enabled as our emulation supports.
* The version of '-cpu max' for qemu-system-arm is defined in cpu.c;
@@ -627,10 +659,6 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, DPB, 2);
t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, JSCVT, 1);
t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, FCMA, 1);
- t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, APA, 1); /* PAuth, architected only */
- t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, API, 0);
- t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, GPA, 1);
- t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, GPI, 0);
t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, SB, 1);
t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, SPECRES, 1);
t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64ISAR1, FRINTTS, 1);
@@ -720,6 +748,10 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
cpu->ctr = 0x80038003; /* 32 byte I and D cacheline size, VIPT icache */
cpu->dcz_blocksize = 7; /* 512 bytes */
#endif
+
+ /* Default to PAUTH on, with the architected algorithm. */
+ qdev_property_add_static(DEVICE(obj), &arm_cpu_pauth_property);
+ qdev_property_add_static(DEVICE(obj), &arm_cpu_pauth_impdef_property);
}
aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj);
diff --git a/target/arm/monitor.c b/target/arm/monitor.c
index 169d8a64b6..0898be5de7 100644
--- a/target/arm/monitor.c
+++ b/target/arm/monitor.c
@@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ static const char *cpu_model_advertised_features[] = {
"sve128", "sve256", "sve384", "sve512",
"sve640", "sve768", "sve896", "sve1024", "sve1152", "sve1280",
"sve1408", "sve1536", "sve1664", "sve1792", "sve1920", "sve2048",
- "kvm-no-adjvtime", "kvm-steal-time",
+ "kvm-no-adjvtime",
+ "pauth", "pauth-impdef",
NULL
};
diff --git a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
index bc681a95d5..8252b85bb8 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -427,6 +427,18 @@ static void sve_tests_sve_off_kvm(const void *data)
qtest_quit(qts);
}
+static void pauth_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
+{
+ assert_has_feature_enabled(qts, cpu_type, "pauth");
+ assert_has_feature_disabled(qts, cpu_type, "pauth-impdef");
+ assert_set_feature(qts, cpu_type, "pauth", false);
+ assert_set_feature(qts, cpu_type, "pauth", true);
+ assert_set_feature(qts, cpu_type, "pauth-impdef", true);
+ assert_set_feature(qts, cpu_type, "pauth-impdef", false);
+ assert_error(qts, cpu_type, "cannot enable pauth-impdef without pauth",
+ "{ 'pauth': false, 'pauth-impdef': true }");
+}
+
static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
{
QTestState *qts;
@@ -462,6 +474,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
assert_has_feature_enabled(qts, "cortex-a57", "aarch64");
sve_tests_default(qts, "max");
+ pauth_tests_default(qts, "max");
/* Test that features that depend on KVM generate errors without. */
assert_error(qts, "max",
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] target/arm: Add cpu properties to control pauth
2020-12-16 22:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] target/arm: Add cpu properties to control pauth Richard Henderson
@ 2021-01-08 14:16 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2021-01-08 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: Mark Rutland, Andrew Jones, qemu-arm, QEMU Developers
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 22:12, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The crypto overhead of emulating pauth can be significant for
> some workloads. Add two boolean properties that allows the
> feature to be turned off, on with the architected algorithm,
> or on with an implementation defined algorithm.
>
> We need two intermediate booleans to control the state while
> parsing properties lest we clobber ID_AA64ISAR1 into an invalid
> intermediate state.
>
> Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Could we have some documentation of the properties in
docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst, please?
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/3] target/arm: Use object_property_add_bool for "sve" property
2020-12-16 22:12 [PATCH v4 0/3] target/arm: Implement an IMPDEF pauth algorithm Richard Henderson
2020-12-16 22:12 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] " Richard Henderson
2020-12-16 22:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] target/arm: Add cpu properties to control pauth Richard Henderson
@ 2020-12-16 22:12 ` Richard Henderson
2020-12-16 22:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2020-12-16 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: peter.maydell, Andrew Jones, qemu-arm
The interface for object_property_add_bool is simpler,
making the code easier to understand.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/cpu64.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index d9feaa9cdb..8e1fad00bb 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -488,6 +488,12 @@ static void cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
cpu->sve_max_vq = max_vq;
}
+/*
+ * Note that cpu_arm_get/set_sve_vq cannot use the simpler
+ * object_property_add_bool interface because they make use
+ * of the contents of "name" to determine which bit on which
+ * to operate.
+ */
static void cpu_arm_get_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
void *opaque, Error **errp)
{
@@ -529,26 +535,17 @@ static void cpu_arm_set_sve_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
set_bit(vq - 1, cpu->sve_vq_init);
}
-static void cpu_arm_get_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
- void *opaque, Error **errp)
+static bool cpu_arm_get_sve(Object *obj, Error **errp)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
- bool value = cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu);
-
- visit_type_bool(v, name, &value, errp);
+ return cpu_isar_feature(aa64_sve, cpu);
}
-static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
- void *opaque, Error **errp)
+static void cpu_arm_set_sve(Object *obj, bool value, Error **errp)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
- bool value;
uint64_t t;
- if (!visit_type_bool(v, name, &value, errp)) {
- return;
- }
-
if (value && kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_sve_supported()) {
error_setg(errp, "'sve' feature not supported by KVM on this host");
return;
@@ -563,8 +560,7 @@ void aarch64_add_sve_properties(Object *obj)
{
uint32_t vq;
- object_property_add(obj, "sve", "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve,
- cpu_arm_set_sve, NULL, NULL);
+ object_property_add_bool(obj, "sve", cpu_arm_get_sve, cpu_arm_set_sve);
for (vq = 1; vq <= ARM_MAX_VQ; ++vq) {
char name[8];
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread