From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Gustavo Romero <gromero@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, gustavo.romero@protonmail.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mroth@lamentation.net,
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, clg@kaod.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org,
rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] target/ppc: Add infrastructure for prefixed instructions
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 15:39:04 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210105043904.GA3209@yekko.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201216090804.58640-2-gromero@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7635 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 06:07:58AM -0300, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> From: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Some prefixed instructions (Type 0 and 1, e.g. 8-byte Load/Store or 8LS),
> have a completely seperate namespace for their primary opcodes.
>
> Other prefixed instructions (Type 2 and 3, e.g. Modified Load/Store or MLS)
> actually re-use existing opcodes to provide a modified variant. We could
> handle these by extending the existing opcode handlers to check for the
> prefix and handle accordingly, but in some cases it is cleaner to define
> seperate handlers for these in their own table entry, and avoids the need
> to add error-handling to existing handlers for cases where they are called
> for a prefixed Type 2/3 instruction but don't implement the handling for
> them. In the future we can re-work things to support both approaches if
> cases arise where that seems warranted.
>
> Then we have the normal non-prefixed instructions.
>
> To handle all 3 of these cases we extend the table size 3x, with normal
> instructions indexed directly by their primary opcodes, Type 0/1 indexed by
> primary opcode + PPC_CPU_PREFIXED_OPCODE_OFFSET, and Type 2/3 indexed by
> primary opcode + PPC_CPU_PREFIXED_MODIFIED_OPCODE_OFFSET.
>
> Various exception/SRR handling changes related to prefixed instructions are
> yet to be implemented. For instance, no alignment interrupt is generated if
> a prefixed instruction crosses the 64-byte boundary; no SRR bit related to
> prefixed instructions is set on any interrupt, like for FP unavailable
> interrupt, data storage interrupt, etc.
>
> For details, please see PowerISA v3.1, particularly the following sections:
>
> 1.6 Instruction Formats, p. 11
> 1.6.3 Instruction Prefix Formats, p. 22
> 3.3.2 Fixed-Point Load Instructions, p. 51
> 4.6.2 Floating-Point Load Instructions, p. 149
> Chapter 7 Interrupts, p. 1247
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mroth@lamentation.net>
> [ gromero: - comments clean up and updates
> - additional comments in the commit log ]
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gromero@linux.ibm.com>
I'm still not seeing any advantage to putting both the plain and
prefixed opcodes into a single table. Essentially you're taking the
prefix and base opcode and encoding them into a single index. Which
isn't inherently wrong, except that the only thing you do with that
single index is effectively decode it back into the original two
parts.
More specifically
[snip]
> +static uint32_t opc1_idx(DisasContext *ctx)
> +{
> + uint32_t table_offset = 0;
> +
> + switch (ctx->prefix_subtype) {
> + case PREFIX_ST_8LS:
> + case PREFIX_ST_8MLS:
> + case PREFIX_ST_8RR:
> + case PREFIX_ST_8MRR:
> + table_offset = PPC_CPU_PREFIXED_OPCODE_OFFSET;
> + break;
> + case PREFIX_ST_MLS:
> + case PREFIX_ST_MMLS:
> + case PREFIX_ST_MRR:
> + case PREFIX_ST_MMRR:
> + case PREFIX_ST_MMIRR:
> + table_offset = PPC_CPU_PREFIXED_MODIFIED_OPCODE_OFFSET;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return table_offset + opc1(ctx->opcode);
> +}
Here, you translate the prefix type into a table offset, but...
> +
> static void ppc_tr_translate_insn(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs)
> {
> DisasContext *ctx = container_of(dcbase, DisasContext, base);
> @@ -8004,14 +8142,40 @@ static void ppc_tr_translate_insn(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cs)
>
> ctx->opcode = translator_ldl_swap(env, ctx->base.pc_next,
> need_byteswap(ctx));
> + /* check for prefix */
> + ctx->prefix_subtype = parse_prefix_subtype(ctx->opcode);
> + if (ctx->prefix_subtype == PREFIX_ST_INVALID) {
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "invalid/unsupported prefix: "
> + "%08x " TARGET_FMT_lx "\n",
> + ctx->prefix, ctx->base.pc_next);
> + } else if (ctx->prefix_subtype != PREFIX_ST_NONE) {
> + /*
> + * this is the 4-byte prefix of an instruction, read the
> + * next 4 and advance the PC
> + *
> + * TODO: we can optimize this to do a single load since we
> + * read in target_long anyways already
> + *
> + * double-check endianess cases.
> + *
> + * engineering note about endianess changing based on rfid
> + * or interrupt. does this need to be accounted for here?
> + */
> + ctx->prefix = ctx->opcode;
> + ctx->base.pc_next += 4;
> + ctx->opcode = translator_ldl_swap(env, ctx->base.pc_next,
> + need_byteswap(ctx));
> + } else {
> + ctx->prefix = 0;
> + }
>
> - LOG_DISAS("translate opcode %08x (%02x %02x %02x %02x) (%s)\n",
> + LOG_DISAS("translate opcode %08x (%02x %02x %02x %02x) prefix %08x (%s)\n",
> ctx->opcode, opc1(ctx->opcode), opc2(ctx->opcode),
> - opc3(ctx->opcode), opc4(ctx->opcode),
> + opc3(ctx->opcode), opc4(ctx->opcode), ctx->prefix,
> ctx->le_mode ? "little" : "big");
> ctx->base.pc_next += 4;
> table = cpu->opcodes;
> - handler = table[opc1(ctx->opcode)];
> + handler = table[opc1_idx(ctx)];
Here, at the only caller, you already have some conditionals on prefix
type, so you could equally well just use a different table.
> if (is_indirect_opcode(handler)) {
> table = ind_table(handler);
> handler = table[opc2(ctx->opcode)];
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate_init.c.inc b/target/ppc/translate_init.c.inc
> index bb66526280..0ea8c2c5c1 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate_init.c.inc
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate_init.c.inc
> @@ -9563,8 +9563,13 @@ static int insert_in_table(opc_handler_t **table, unsigned char idx,
> }
>
> static int register_direct_insn(opc_handler_t **ppc_opcodes,
> - unsigned char idx, opc_handler_t *handler)
> + unsigned char idx, opc_handler_t *handler,
> + bool prefixed, bool modified)
> {
> + if (prefixed) {
> + idx = modified ? idx + PPC_CPU_PREFIXED_MODIFIED_OPCODE_OFFSET
> + : idx + PPC_CPU_PREFIXED_OPCODE_OFFSET;
> + }
> if (insert_in_table(ppc_opcodes, idx, handler) < 0) {
> printf("*** ERROR: opcode %02x already assigned in main "
> "opcode table\n", idx);
> @@ -9688,7 +9693,8 @@ static int register_insn(opc_handler_t **ppc_opcodes, opcode_t *insn)
> }
> }
> } else {
> - if (register_direct_insn(ppc_opcodes, insn->opc1, &insn->handler) < 0) {
> + if (register_direct_insn(ppc_opcodes, insn->opc1, &insn->handler,
> + insn->prefixed, insn->modified) < 0) {
> return -1;
> }
> }
> @@ -9766,6 +9772,7 @@ static void dump_ppc_insns(CPUPPCState *env)
> for (opc1 = 0x00; opc1 < PPC_CPU_OPCODES_LEN; opc1++) {
> table = env->opcodes;
> handler = table[opc1];
> + /* TODO: need to update opcode dump to account for prefixed space */
> if (is_indirect_opcode(handler)) {
> /* opc2 is 5 bits long */
> for (opc2 = 0; opc2 < PPC_CPU_INDIRECT_OPCODES_LEN; opc2++) {
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-05 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-16 9:07 [PATCH v2 0/7] PPC64: Add support for the new prefixed instructions Gustavo Romero
2020-12-16 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] target/ppc: Add infrastructure for " Gustavo Romero
2021-01-05 4:39 ` David Gibson [this message]
2020-12-16 9:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] target/ppc: Add support for prefixed load/store instructions Gustavo Romero
2020-12-16 9:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] tests/tcg: Add tests " Gustavo Romero
2020-12-16 9:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] target/ppc: Add support for paired vector " Gustavo Romero
2020-12-16 9:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] tests/tcg: Add tests " Gustavo Romero
2020-12-16 9:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] target/ppc: Add support for prefixed load/store FP instructions Gustavo Romero
2020-12-16 9:08 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] tests/tcg: Add tests " Gustavo Romero
2020-12-16 9:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] PPC64: Add support for the new prefixed instructions no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210105043904.GA3209@yekko.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=gromero@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gustavo.romero@protonmail.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mroth@lamentation.net \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).