From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: pair@us.ibm.com, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
brijesh.singh@amd.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
pragyansri.pathi@intel.com, mst@redhat.com,
mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
andi.kleen@intel.com, thuth@redhat.com,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, dgilbert@redhat.com,
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/13] spapr: Add PEF based confidential guest support
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:56:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210112095612.GE1360503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112044508.427338-11-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:45:05PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> Some upcoming POWER machines have a system called PEF (Protected
> Execution Facility) which uses a small ultravisor to allow guests to
> run in a way that they can't be eavesdropped by the hypervisor. The
> effect is roughly similar to AMD SEV, although the mechanisms are
> quite different.
>
> Most of the work of this is done between the guest, KVM and the
> ultravisor, with little need for involvement by qemu. However qemu
> does need to tell KVM to allow secure VMs.
>
> Because the availability of secure mode is a guest visible difference
> which depends on having the right hardware and firmware, we don't
> enable this by default. In order to run a secure guest you need to
> create a "pef-guest" object and set the confidential-guest-support
> property to point to it.
>
> Note that this just *allows* secure guests, the architecture of PEF is
> such that the guest still needs to talk to the ultravisor to enter
> secure mode. Qemu has no directl way of knowing if the guest is in
> secure mode, and certainly can't know until well after machine
> creation time.
>
> To start a PEF-capable guest, use the command line options:
> -object pef-guest,id=pef0 -machine confidential-guest-support=pef0
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> docs/confidential-guest-support.txt | 2 +
> docs/papr-pef.txt | 30 ++++++++
> hw/ppc/meson.build | 1 +
> hw/ppc/pef.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 10 +++
> include/hw/ppc/pef.h | 26 +++++++
> target/ppc/kvm.c | 18 -----
> target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h | 6 --
> 8 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 docs/papr-pef.txt
> create mode 100644 hw/ppc/pef.c
> create mode 100644 include/hw/ppc/pef.h
>
> +static const TypeInfo pef_guest_info = {
> + .parent = TYPE_OBJECT,
> + .name = TYPE_PEF_GUEST,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(PefGuestState),
> + .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
> + { TYPE_CONFIDENTIAL_GUEST_SUPPORT },
> + { TYPE_USER_CREATABLE },
> + { }
> + }
> +};
IIUC, the earlier patch defines TYPE_CONFIDENTIAL_GUEST_SUPPORT
as a object, but you're using it as an interface here. The later
s390 patch uses it as a parent, which makes more sense given it
is a declared as an object.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 4:44 [PATCH v6 00/13] Generalize memory encryption models David Gibson
2021-01-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] qom: Allow optional sugar props David Gibson
2021-01-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] confidential guest support: Introduce new confidential guest support class David Gibson
2021-01-12 9:46 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-01-13 2:09 ` David Gibson
2021-01-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] sev: Remove false abstraction of flash encryption David Gibson
2021-01-12 4:44 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] confidential guest support: Move side effect out of machine_set_memory_encryption() David Gibson
2021-01-12 10:39 ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-12 4:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] confidential guest support: Rework the "memory-encryption" property David Gibson
2021-01-12 10:59 ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-13 0:50 ` David Gibson
2021-01-13 12:03 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-01-12 4:45 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] sev: Add Error ** to sev_kvm_init() David Gibson
2021-01-12 4:45 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] confidential guest support: Introduce cgs "ready" flag David Gibson
2021-01-12 4:45 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] confidential guest support: Move SEV initialization into arch specific code David Gibson
2021-01-12 4:45 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] confidential guest support: Update documentation David Gibson
2021-01-12 4:45 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] spapr: Add PEF based confidential guest support David Gibson
2021-01-12 7:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-01-12 8:36 ` David Gibson
2021-01-12 9:52 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-01-12 9:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-01-13 0:52 ` David Gibson
2021-01-12 11:27 ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-13 0:56 ` David Gibson
2021-01-12 4:45 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] spapr: PEF: prevent migration David Gibson
2021-01-12 11:37 ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-12 4:45 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] confidential guest support: Alter virtio default properties for protected guests David Gibson
2021-01-12 11:38 ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-12 4:45 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option David Gibson
2021-01-12 8:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-01-12 11:36 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-01-12 11:48 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-01-12 11:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-01-13 0:57 ` David Gibson
2021-01-13 6:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-01-13 23:56 ` David Gibson
2021-01-12 9:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210112095612.GE1360503@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pair@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pragyansri.pathi@intel.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).