From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Xujun Ma <xuma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] spapr.c: consider CPU core online state before allowing unplug
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:12:03 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118011203.GC2089552@yekko.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210115182216.6dccadee@bahia.lan>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6325 bytes --]
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 06:22:16PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:06:28 -0300
> Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The only restriction we have when unplugging CPUs is to forbid unplug of
> > the boot cpu core. spapr_core_unplug_possible() does not contemplate the
>
> I can't remember why this restriction was introduced in the first place...
> This should be investigated and documented if the limitation still stands.
>
> > possibility of some cores being offlined by the guest, meaning that we're
> > rolling the dice regarding on whether we're unplugging the last online
> > CPU core the guest has.
> >
>
> Trying to unplug the last CPU is obviously something that deserves
> special care. LoPAPR is quite explicit on the outcome : this should
> terminate the partition.
>
> 13.7.4.1.1. Isolation of CPUs
>
> The isolation of a CPU, in all cases, is preceded by the stop-self
> RTAS function for all processor threads, and the OS insures that all
> the CPU’s threads are in the RTAS stopped state prior to isolating the
> CPU. Isolation of a processor that is not stopped produces unpredictable
> results. The stopping of the last processor thread of a LPAR partition
> effectively kills the partition, and at that point, ownership of all
> partition resources reverts to the platform firmware.
>
> R1-13.7.4.1.1-1. For the LRDR option: Prior to issuing the RTAS
> set-indicator specifying isolate isolation-state of a CPU DR
> connector type, all the CPU threads must be in the RTAS stopped
> state.
>
> R1-13.7.4.1.1-2. For the LRDR option: Stopping of the last processor
> thread of a LPAR partition with the stop-self RTAS function, must kill
> the partition, with ownership of all partition resources reverting to
> the platform firmware.
>
> This is clearly not how things work today : linux doesn't call
> "stop-self" on the last vCPU and even if it did, QEMU doesn't
> terminate the VM.
> If there's a valid reason to not implement this PAPR behavior, I'd like
> it to be documented.
So, we should implement this in QEMU - if you stop-self the last
thread, it should be the equivalent of a power off. Linux not ever
doing that probably makes sense - it wants you to encourage you to
shut down properly for data safety.
> > If we hit the jackpot, we're going to detach the core DRC and pulse the
> > hotplug IRQ, but the guest OS will refuse to release the CPU. Our
> > spapr_core_unplug() DRC release callback will never be called and the CPU
> > core object will keep existing in QEMU. No error message will be sent
> > to the user, but the CPU core wasn't unplugged from the guest.
> >
> > If the guest OS onlines the CPU core again we won't be able to hotunplug it
> > either. 'dmesg' inside the guest will report a failed attempt to offline an
> > unknown CPU:
> >
> > [ 923.003994] pseries-hotplug-cpu: Failed to offline CPU <NULL>, rc: -16
> >
> > This is the result of stopping the DRC state transition in the middle in the
> > first failed attempt.
> >
>
> Yes, at this point only a machine reset can fix things up.
>
> Given this is linux's choice not to call "stop-self" as it should do, I'm not
> super fan of hardcoding this logic in QEMU, unless there are really good
> reasons to do so.
Uh.. sorry I don't follow how linux is doing something wrong here.
> > We can avoid this, and potentially other bad things from happening, if we
> > avoid to attempt the unplug altogether in this scenario. Let's check for
> > the online/offline state of the CPU cores in the guest before allowing
> > the hotunplug, and forbid removing a CPU core if it's the last one online
> > in the guest.
> >
> > Reported-by: Xujun Ma <xuma@redhat.com>
> > Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911414
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > index a2f01c21aa..d269dcd102 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > @@ -3709,9 +3709,16 @@ static void spapr_core_unplug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev)
> > static int spapr_core_unplug_possible(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, CPUCore *cc,
> > Error **errp)
> > {
> > + CPUArchId *core_slot;
> > + SpaprCpuCore *core;
> > + PowerPCCPU *cpu;
> > + CPUState *cs;
> > + bool last_cpu_online = true;
> > int index;
> >
> > - if (!spapr_find_cpu_slot(MACHINE(hotplug_dev), cc->core_id, &index)) {
> > + core_slot = spapr_find_cpu_slot(MACHINE(hotplug_dev), cc->core_id,
> > + &index);
> > + if (!core_slot) {
> > error_setg(errp, "Unable to find CPU core with core-id: %d",
> > cc->core_id);
> > return -1;
> > @@ -3722,6 +3729,36 @@ static int spapr_core_unplug_possible(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, CPUCore *cc,
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > + /* Allow for any non-boot CPU core to be unplugged if already offline */
> > + core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(core_slot->cpu);
> > + cs = CPU(core->threads[0]);
> > + if (cs->halted) {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Do not allow core unplug if it's the last core online.
> > + */
> > + cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> > + CPU_FOREACH(cs) {
> > + PowerPCCPU *c = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> > +
> > + if (c == cpu) {
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!cs->halted) {
> > + last_cpu_online = false;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (last_cpu_online) {
> > + error_setg(errp, "Unable to unplug CPU core with core-id %d: it is "
> > + "the only CPU core online in the guest", cc->core_id);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-14 18:06 [PATCH v1 0/7] pseries: avoid unplug the last online CPU core + assorted fixes Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-14 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] spapr.h: fix trailing whitespace in phb_placement Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-15 0:42 ` David Gibson
2021-01-14 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] spapr_hcall.c: make do_client_architecture_support static Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-15 0:43 ` David Gibson
2021-01-14 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] spapr_rtas.c: fix identation in rtas_ibm_nmi_interlock() string Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-15 0:44 ` David Gibson
2021-01-14 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] spapr_rtas.c: fix identation of rtas_ibm_suspend_me() args Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-15 0:45 ` David Gibson
2021-01-14 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] spapr_cpu_core.c: use g_auto* in spapr_create_vcpu() Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-15 0:49 ` David Gibson
2021-01-14 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] spapr.c: introduce spapr_core_unplug_possible() Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-15 0:52 ` David Gibson
2021-01-14 18:06 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] spapr.c: consider CPU core online state before allowing unplug Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-15 1:03 ` David Gibson
2021-01-15 17:22 ` Greg Kurz
2021-01-15 18:52 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-18 1:18 ` David Gibson
2021-01-18 10:28 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-15 21:43 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-15 21:43 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2021-01-18 1:12 ` David Gibson [this message]
2021-01-18 11:03 ` Greg Kurz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210118011203.GC2089552@yekko.fritz.box \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=xuma@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).