From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
To: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] hw/block/nvme: fix 64 bit register hi/lo split writes
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 21:41:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118124100.GB18718@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210118094705.56772-3-its@irrelevant.dk>
On 21-01-18 10:46:55, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
>
> 64 bit registers like ASQ and ACQ should be writable by both a hi/lo 32
> bit write combination as well as a plain 64 bit write. The spec does not
> define ordering on the hi/lo split, but the code currently assumes that
> the low order bits are written first. Additionally, the code does not
> consider that another address might already have been written into the
> register, causing the OR'ing to result in a bad address.
>
> Fix this by explicitly overwriting only the low or high order bits for
> 32 bit writes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> ---
> hw/block/nvme.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> index bd7e258c3c26..40b9f8ccfc0e 100644
> --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> @@ -3781,19 +3781,21 @@ static void nvme_write_bar(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr offset, uint64_t data,
> trace_pci_nvme_mmio_aqattr(data & 0xffffffff);
> break;
> case 0x28: /* ASQ */
> - n->bar.asq = data;
> + n->bar.asq = size == 8 ? data :
> + (n->bar.asq & ~0xffffffff) | (data & 0xffffffff);
^^^^^^^^^^^
If this one is to unmask lower 32bits other than higher 32bits, then
it should be:
(n->bar.asq & ~0xffffffffULL)
Also, maybe we should take care of lower than 4bytes as:
.min_access_size = 2,
.max_access_size = 8,
Even we have some error messages up there with:
if (unlikely(size < sizeof(uint32_t))) {
NVME_GUEST_ERR(pci_nvme_ub_mmiowr_toosmall,
"MMIO write smaller than 32-bits,"
" offset=0x%"PRIx64", size=%u",
offset, size);
/* should be ignored, fall through for now */
}
It's a fall-thru error, and that's it. I would prefer not to have this
error and support for 2bytes access also, OR do not support for 2bytes
access for this MMIO area.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-18 9:46 [PATCH v2 00/12] hw/block/nvme: misc cmb/pmr patches and bump to v1.4 Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] hw/block/nvme: add size to mmio read/write trace events Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 12:29 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] hw/block/nvme: fix 64 bit register hi/lo split writes Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 12:41 ` Minwoo Im [this message]
2021-01-18 12:53 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 12:59 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 19:53 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-01-19 2:09 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-19 18:58 ` Keith Busch
2021-01-18 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] hw/block/nvme: indicate CMB support through controller capabilities register Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 12:42 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] hw/block/nvme: move msix table and pba to BAR 0 Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 12:48 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] hw/block/nvme: allow cmb and pmr to coexist Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 12:50 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] hw/block/nvme: rename PMR/CMB shift/mask fields Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 12:52 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] hw/block/nvme: remove redundant zeroing of PMR registers Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 12:55 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 13:02 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] hw/block/nvme: disable PMR at boot up Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] hw/block/nvme: add PMR RDS/WDS support Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] hw/block/nvme: move cmb logic to v1.4 Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 12:58 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 13:04 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 13:09 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 13:10 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 13:12 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 13:22 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 19:23 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-01-19 2:11 ` Minwoo Im
2021-01-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] hw/block/nvme: bump " Klaus Jensen
2021-01-18 9:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] hw/block/nvme: lift cmb restrictions Klaus Jensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210118124100.GB18718@localhost.localdomain \
--to=minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).