From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
To: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Jean-Christophe Dubois" <jcd@tribudubois.net>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
"Alistair Francis" <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 06/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Rework imx_spi_write() to handle block disabled
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 21:23:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210129132323.30946-7-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210129132323.30946-1-bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
When the block is disabled, only the ECSPI_CONREG register can
be modified. Setting the EN bit enabled the device, clearing it
"disables the block and resets the internal logic with the
exception of the ECSPI_CONREG" register.
Ignore all other registers write except ECSPI_CONREG when the
block is disabled.
Ref: i.MX 6DQ Applications Processor Reference Manual (IMX6DQRM),
chapter 21.7.3: Control Register (ECSPIx_CONREG)
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20210115153049.3353008-6-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
(no changes since v8)
Changes in v8:
- keep the controller disable logic in the ECSPI_CONREG case
in imx_spi_write()
Changes in v7:
- remove the RFC tag
Changes in v6:
- new patch: [RFC] rework imx_spi_write() to handle block disabled
hw/ssi/imx_spi.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ssi/imx_spi.c b/hw/ssi/imx_spi.c
index 21e2c9dea3..4cfbb73e35 100644
--- a/hw/ssi/imx_spi.c
+++ b/hw/ssi/imx_spi.c
@@ -332,6 +332,14 @@ static void imx_spi_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
DPRINTF("reg[%s] <= 0x%" PRIx32 "\n", imx_spi_reg_name(index),
(uint32_t)value);
+ if (!imx_spi_is_enabled(s)) {
+ /* Block is disabled */
+ if (index != ECSPI_CONREG) {
+ /* Ignore access */
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
change_mask = s->regs[index] ^ value;
switch (index) {
@@ -340,10 +348,7 @@ static void imx_spi_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
TYPE_IMX_SPI, __func__);
break;
case ECSPI_TXDATA:
- if (!imx_spi_is_enabled(s)) {
- /* Ignore writes if device is disabled */
- break;
- } else if (fifo32_is_full(&s->tx_fifo)) {
+ if (fifo32_is_full(&s->tx_fifo)) {
/* Ignore writes if queue is full */
break;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-29 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-29 13:23 [PATCH v9 00/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Fix various bugs in the imx_spi model Bin Meng
2021-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Use a macro for number of chip selects supported Bin Meng
2021-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Remove imx_spi_update_irq() in imx_spi_reset() Bin Meng
2021-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Remove pointless variable initialization Bin Meng
2021-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Rework imx_spi_reset() to keep CONREG register value Bin Meng
2021-01-29 14:00 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Rework imx_spi_read() to handle block disabled Bin Meng
2021-01-29 13:23 ` Bin Meng [this message]
2021-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Disable chip selects when controller is disabled Bin Meng
2021-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Round up the burst length to be multiple of 8 Bin Meng
2021-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Correct the burst length > 32 bit transfer logic Bin Meng
2021-01-29 13:23 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Correct tx and rx fifo endianness Bin Meng
2021-02-02 11:39 ` [PATCH v9 00/10] hw/ssi: imx_spi: Fix various bugs in the imx_spi model Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210129132323.30946-7-bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--to=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=bin.meng@windriver.com \
--cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
--cc=jcd@tribudubois.net \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).