From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEAEC433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7452B64EAC for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:42:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7452B64EAC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:43762 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6u51-0006Ec-7f for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 06:42:47 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6u3o-0005OF-Fr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 06:41:32 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:36403) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6u3l-00044T-T5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 06:41:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1612266088; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W93yZkeRmV4ELTyGRZimoC4cSFtpWjcQDy/+UphjoGM=; b=TznUqbKBEv3/q0V/VDIldITcFSrNvLtQjHNbr4SqV+cchZUnNQw410rt3PxbQdiO38TQsH kgcUu9cHQy8XGtMZs4jApGfJYJzpjkSnNZgsYKB1aXn8lmA7az0XJ0826QopGkl8UTA/R2 jtGPxOBhBI1Qt9HX2nWUDjPMbPAESzc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-405-06VGXAxeOG-co6k6zwEOzQ-1; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 06:41:26 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 06VGXAxeOG-co6k6zwEOzQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84184801817; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merkur.fritz.box (ovpn-112-19.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F3060C05; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 12:41:23 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PULL 0/2] block: Fix iotests to respect configured Python binary Message-ID: <20210202114123.GB5184@merkur.fritz.box> References: <20210129145240.34104-1-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kwolf@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.386, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: QEMU Developers , Qemu-block Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Am 02.02.2021 um 10:47 hat Peter Maydell geschrieben: > On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:13, Peter Maydell wrote: > > This is definitely better so I'm going to apply it, but it seems > > to reveal a pile of iotest failures on FreeBSD: > > > Failures: 030 040 041 127 256 > > It seems to consistently be these five. What do they have in common ? That's a very good question, especially if you ask what they have in common with each other, but with no other test. With 030 040 041, your theory of running out of memory seemed to make a lot of sense because these are the big block job tests. But 127 doesn't fit in that group at all, it's a very small test on a tiny 64k image. Unlike the other tests in your list that make use of our Python framework, it's also just a shell script. Other criteria that make 127 special like that it uses scsi and/or iothreads don't apply to all other failed cases, but instead to other cases that pass. Are you still getting the same error message and is it the same for all Python test cases? ("Unexpected empty reply from server") If QEMU had been killed, there should be a message telling with which signal it exited (if that code works correctly on NetBSD). In any case, the output for 127 must be different because it doesn't use the Python framework. Can you post the diff for that one? Kevin